Canadian Gov't Nullifies 'Gay Marriages' For Non-Canadians
A report says the government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper in Canada has served notice that thousands of same-sex couples who flocked to Canada from abroad since 2004 to get married are not legally wed.
The Globe and Mail newspaper says the reversal in policy was revealed in a document the government filed in a divorce case involving two lesbians. The two women -- one from Florida and the other from England -- went to Canada in 2005 and got "married." The couple has been told they cannot divorce because they were never legally married.
According to the document filed by the Harper Justice department, the marriage of the two lesbians is not legal in Canada since they could not have been lawfully wed in Florida and England at the time.
Homosexual marriage was legalized in Canada in 2004. The Globe and Mail reports that since then, approximately 5,000 of the 15,000 same-sex marriages that have taken place have involved couples from the United States or other countries.
The Justice department's position document also notes that couples who come to Canada to be married must live in the country for at least a year before they can obtain a divorce.
Defenders of same-gender marriage in Canada are saying the government's decision "reflects intolerance" and has given the country an international black eye. –One News Now
<><><>*<><><>
Church Deems 'Today's NIV' Inaccurate
A Houston mega-church is joining other congregations in turning their thumbs down to the 2011 NIV due to "accuracy concerns."
Houston First Baptist Church had considered replacing the NIVs used throughout the church with a more recent translation, but the 2011 version it had its eye on was one under scrutiny. Spokesman Steven Murray tells OneNewsNow it came time for Pastor Gregge Matte to make a choice.
"Late last year, as we saw the changes that were made to the NIV and we looked at our supply of Bibles that we place in our worship center seat-backs that we make available for people who may not have one, our inventory was running down, and we learned that the NIV 1984 would no longer be produced," he accounts.
The 2011 NIV actually began as Today's New International Version (TNIV), but changes were softened a bit after a public and academic uproar. That was in part due to a change in references to homosexuality and a step toward gender-neutral language.
"When they looked at the body of changes that were made to the NIV this past year, that was one of them. But by no means was it the only one," Murray explains.
In the final analysis, the church decided to dump the 2011 NIV and go with the Holman Christian Standard Bible instead. Pastor Matte says he wanted their Bible "to be as accurate as possible to the literal intent of the authors." -One News Now
<><><>*<><><>
Men Arrested For Reading Bible
A California apologist notes that officials of one city had no grounds for arresting three Christians for reading out loud from the Bible.
Arraignments were postponed for two Christians who were arrested outside a Department of Motor Vehicles office in Hemet for reading their Bible. Brett Coronado, who was an assistant pastor at Calvary Chapel, Hemet, and Mark Mackey, who worked in the church's evangelism ministry, each face one misdemeanor count for creating a disturbance. Defense attorneys asked the court to postpone the hearing until March 2.
The two men were arrested for reading from the Bible to roughly 50 individuals waiting in line outside the DMV. A security guard told Mackey to stop, and when Mackey refused, a police officer was called and Mackey was arrested. Coronado and another church elder then asked the police officer what law Mackey broke, but instead of an answer, they were arrested as well. Lenny Esposito, president of Come Reason Ministries, argues that there was no legitimate cause for the arrest.
"From a legal perspective, I think the officer mishandled the situation, and I don't know that he had grounds for arresting these individuals," he says.
Officials say Coronado and Mackey could not preach on state property without a permit. But attorneys for the two men say the First Amendment rights of their clients were violated, and Esposito believes the men will not face jail time.
"I don't think so,” he tells OneNewsNow. “I think they just wanted to shut them up and the terms will be dropped and they'll let them go." -One News Now








