Sep 25, 2011

Panetta: Threat Of Another 9/11 Is Real

After a decade of war with al Qaeda, the potential for another devastating terrorist assault “remains very real,” Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta said Tuesday following a somber visit to ground zero of the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center.

The Pentagon chief walked through the National September 11 Memorial & Museum with Mayor Michael Bloomberg and afterward told reporters that Americans must remain vigilant against the threat of another successful al Qaeda attack.

“The potential for that kind of attack remains very real,” he said from the 10th floor of 7 World Trade Center, the first completed office tower at the site where hijacked commercial airliners were flown into the Twin Towers, killing more than 2,700 people.

Bad weather forced Mr. Panetta to scratch plans to visit Shanksville, Pa., where hijackers flew United Flight 93 into the ground, killing all 40 passengers and crew shortly after the coordinated terrorist attack began in New York.

Noting that many of al Qaeda’s top leaders, including Osama bin Laden, have been captured or killed in recent months, Mr. Panetta said the nature of the terrorist threat has evolved to the point that al Qaeda “nodes” outside Afghanistan and Pakistan are now the most dangerous.

“Yemen has risen to the top of the list,” he said.

Mr. Panetta’s New York visit gave him an early glimpse at the memorial, with its majestic, 30-foot-tall, man-made walls of water that hug the sides of 1-acre reflecting pools that encompass the ground where the Twin Towers stood. The water is meant to signify falling tears.

Mr. Panetta also took a peek inside the entrance to the museum, which is still under construction. And he was shown the “Survivor Tree,” a non-fruit-bearing pear tree that was rescued from the World Trade Center grounds after the terrorist attacks. It stands amid the white oaks, near the reflecting pool at the former South Tower.

Dozens of workers scrambled Tuesday morning to put the finishing touches on the memorial as they planted ivy as ground cover around the 225 white oak trees that surround the reflecting pools.

The Sept. 11 attacks killed nearly 3,000 people, including 184 at the Pentagon. The names of every person who died in the attacks, including those at the Pentagon and in Shanksville, are inscribed in bronze panels that edge the reflecting pools at the Twin Towers site.

Mr. Panetta’s spokesman, Doug Wilson, said the Pentagon chief wanted to visit Shanksville and New York to highlight the role the military has played over the past decade in preventing further attacks on the homeland. Accompanying him on his trip Tuesday were five service members — one each from the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force and Coast Guard.

The visit also recalled the most memorable event of Mr. Panetta’s tenure as CIA director: the May killing of bin Laden.

Mr. Panetta will attend 9/11 memorial events at the Pentagon on Sunday.

He was a private citizen on 9/11 but happened to be on Capitol Hill at the time of the attacks, according to his press secretary, George Little.

Shanksville remains the least publicized of the three 9/11 attack sites. In its final report, the official 9/11 Commission that investigated the terrorist plot wrote a gripping account of what happened aboard Flight 93.

The commission determined that the plane, overtaken by four hijackers, slammed into the ground at 11 seconds past 10:03 EDT on a path over Pennsylvania toward its intended target in Washington — either the Capitol or the White House.

It departed from Newark, N.J., bound for San Francisco, at 8:42 a.m. The hijackers took over the cockpit 46 minutes later. At 9:57 a.m., a passenger revolt began. The cockpit voice recorder captured sounds of the passenger assault.

“Some family members listening to the recording report that they can hear the voice of a loved one among the din,” the 9/11 Commission report said.

Within minutes, the hijackers apparently determined they were about to be overpowered and decided to abort their mission and destroy the plane. “The aircraft plowed into an empty field in Shanksville, Pa., at 580 mph, about 20 minutes’ flying time from Washington, D.C.,” the report said. –The Washington Times
Ray Stevens - The Mississippi Squirrel Revival

Christians In China: Is The Country In Spiritual Crisis?

Many of China's churches are overflowing, as the number of Christians in the country multiplies. In the past, repression drove people to convert - is the cause now rampant capitalism?

It is impossible to say how many Christians there are in China today, but no-one denies the numbers are exploding.

The government says 25 million, 18 million Protestants and six million Catholics. Independent estimates all agree this is a vast underestimate. A conservative figure is 60 million. There are already more Chinese at church on a Sunday than in the whole of Europe.

The new converts can be found from peasants in the remote rural villages to the sophisticated young middle class in the booming cities.

Driven underground

There is a complexity in the structures of Chinese Christianity which is little understood in the West. To start with, Catholicism and Protestantism are designated by the state as two separate religions.

Throughout the 20th Century, Christianity was associated with Western imperialism. After the Communist victory in 1949, the missionaries were expelled, but Christianity was permitted in state-sanctioned churches, so long as they gave their primary allegiance to the Communist Party.

Mao, on the other hand, described religion as "poison", and the Cultural Revolution of the 1960s and 70s attempted to eradicate it. Driven underground, Christianity not only survived, but with its own Chinese martyrs, it grew in strength.

Since the 1980s, when religious belief was again permitted, the official Churches have gradually created more space for themselves.

They report to the State Administration for Religious Affairs. They are forbidden to take part in any religious activity outside their places of worship and sign up to the slogan, "Love the country - love your religion."

In return the Party promotes atheism in schools but undertakes "to protect and respect religion until such time as religion itself will disappear".

House Churches

Protestants and Catholics are both divided into official and unofficial Churches.

The officially sanctioned Catholic Patriotic Association appoints its own bishops and is not allowed to have any dealings with the Vatican, though Catholics are allowed to recognize the spiritual authority of the Pope.

There is a larger Catholic underground church, supported by the Vatican. Inch by inch, the Vatican and the government have been moving towards accommodation. Most bishops are now recognized by both, with neither side admitting the greater sovereignty of the other.

Yet in the past few months, the Chinese government has again turned tough, ordaining its bishops in the teeth of opposition from the Vatican which has in turn excommunicated one of them.
Even so, it would be wrong simply to dismiss the official church as a sham.

In the mountains West of Beijing, I visited the village of Hou Sangyu where a Catholic Church has stood since the 14th Century.

The tough faith of these old people had withstood the Japanese invasion and the Cultural Revolution. The village clinic was run by nuns, one from Inner Mongolia, a Catholic stronghold.
It is from such villages that the Catholic Church recruits its young ordinands, to undertake training for the priesthood.

The official Protestant Church is growing faster than Catholicism.

On Easter morning, in downtown Beijing, I watched five services, each packed with over 1,500 worshipers. Sunday school was spilling on to the street.

However, these numbers are dwarfed by the unofficial "house churches", spreading across the country, at odds with the official Church which fears the house churches' fervor may provoke a backlash.

What the authorities consider non-negotiable is the house churches' refusal to acknowledge any official authority over their organization.

The State fears the influence of zealous American evangelism and some of the House Church theology has those characteristics, but, in many other respects, it seems to be an indigenous Chinese movement - charismatic, energetic and young.

An educated young Christian described her church to me: "We have 50 young professionals in this church. Everyone is so busy working, you don't have time socializing, and even if you are socialising, you are putting on a fake face.

"But in church people feel warm, they feel welcome… they feel people really love them so they really want to join the community, a lot of people come for this."

Alpha marriage course

A Chinese academic close to the government told me that the government would prefer to ignore the house churches, as unlike the Falun Gong they are not seen as a threat. But where a church oversteps the line, as happened in Beijing this year, taking its worship on to the streets, then the authorities will crack down.

In some areas the state has sought to enlist Christianity into its "big idea" of a "harmonious society" - the slogan that dominates Chinese public life. There has been official interest in the Western evangelical Alpha Marriage Course, because of alarm at the escalating divorce rate among young Chinese.

What must unsettle the authorities most is the reason why so many are turning to the churches.
I heard people talking again and again of a "spiritual crisis" in China - a phrase that has even been used by the Premier Wen Jiao Bao. The old have seen the old certainties of Marxism-Leninism transmute into the most visceral capitalist society on earth.

For the young, in the stampede to get rich, trust in institutions, between individuals, between the generations, is breaking down.

As one of China's most eminent philosophers of religion - Professor He Guanghu, at Renmin University in Beijing put it to me: "The worship of Mammon… has become many people's life purpose.

"I think it is very natural that many other people will not be satisfied... will seek some meaning for their lives so that when Christianity falls into their lives, they will seize it very tightly." -By Tim Gardam (BBC News)

What And Who Are Angels?

According To Children:

I only know the names of two angels, Hark and Harold. -Gregory, age 5

Everybody's got it all wrong. Angels don't wear halos anymore. I forget why, but scientists are working on it. -Olive, age 9

It's not easy to become an angel! First, you die. Then you go to Heaven, and then there's still the flight training to go through. And then you got to agree to wear those angel clothes. -Matthew, age 9

Angels work for God and watch over kids when God has to go do something else. -Mitchell, age 7

My guardian angel helps me with math, but he's not much good for science. -Henry, age 8

Angels don't eat, but they drink milk from Holy Cows! -Jack, age 6

Angels talk all the way while they're flying you up to heaven. The main subject is where you went wrong before you got dead. -Daniel, age 9

When an angel gets mad, he takes a deep breath and counts to ten, and when he lets out his breath again, somewhere there's a tornado. -Reagan, age 10

Angels have a lot to do and they keep very busy. If you lose a tooth, an angel comes in through your window and leaves money under your pillow. Then when it gets cold, angels go south for the winter. -Sara, age 6

Angels live in cloud houses made by God and his son, who's a very good carpenter. -Jared, age 8

All angels are girls because they gotta wear dresses and boys didn't go for it. -Antonio, age 9

My angel is my grandma who died last year. She got a big head start on helping me while she was still down here on earth. -Ashley, age 9

Some of the angels are in charge of helping heal sick animals and pets. And if they don't make the animals get better, they help the child get over it. -Vicki , age 8

What I don't get about angels is why, when someone is in love, they shoot arrows at them. - Sarah, age 7
Sea Turtle Extinction: Not Global Warming


Maybe we have just discovered why
the sea turtle is going extinct &
it is not global warming!

Pictures From Costa Rica
Photographer Unknown

If We Can't Take Care Of Our Planet Now
Will We Do Any Better In The New Earth?

Sep 18, 2011

Ragbag Headliners

Calif Gay History Referendum Faces Uphill Battle

At churches, shopping centers and schools in California, volunteers have started gathering signatures for a ballot referendum that would repeal the nation's first law requiring public schools to include prominent homosexuals and gay rights' milestones in school lessons.

They say the new mandate would inappropriately expose young children to sex, infringe on parental rights and silence religion-based criticism of homosexuality. Those are talking points successfully used by proponents of Proposition 8, the 2008 ballot measure that banned same-sex marriage in California.

But so far, Mormon and Catholic leaders who spearheaded the Proposition 8 campaign have not joined the effort to put the gay history referendum on the June 2012 ballot, leaving less-experienced Christian conservatives to gather the more than 500,000 needed signatures by Oct. 12. One News Now

<><><>*<><><>

Silence From Clergy On 9/11 Religion Ban

The silence of our so-called religious leaders in reaction to the ban of clergy at the upcoming Sept. 11 anniversary ceremony in New York and the ban of the word God at military cemeteries is deafening.

How long will Christians and Jews turn the other cheek? How many sermons ever mention the strong religious conviction of the majority of our Founding Fathers? If our priests, ministers and rabbis wanted sheep for followers, they got them. One nation under God? In God we trust? You tell me. –Joseph Dupont

Letter To The Editor/The Washington Times

The Intolerance Of The Preachers of Tolerance

The Washington National Cathedral, in its commemoration of the 10th anniversary of 9/11, has deliberately and carefully excluded evangelicals from their multi-religious commemoration. The service includes Buddhists, Hindus, and Muslims, but not evangelical Christians. Mind you, I am opposed to interfaith services in any shape or form and that  is why, in a previous blog, I stated that I was relieved that the Mayor of New York spared us the agony of watching the One, True God of the Bible “worshipped” alongside false gods.

The National Cathedral is a member of the Protestant Episcopal Cathedral Foundation. Having served as an Episcopal Priest in the past for a number of years, the fact that they have excluded evangelicals from their service did not come as a surprise to me at all. Twenty-five years ago, I was one of only a few evangelicals left in that denomination and some of my colleagues labeled me as “narrow-minded” and “intolerant”.  What was my sin? I took Jesus at His word and believed that He and He alone – by dying on the cross and rising again – is the only way to the Father and eternal life in Heaven for all people of all races and religions.

For believing Jesus’ own claim that He is “the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6), I was called “intolerant”. Never mind over 500 years of Anglican history that proclaimed these truths and enshrined them in its Thirty-Nine Articles of Faith. Never mind the many Anglican martyrs who have died defending this truth.

I remember asking the question once, “If you are so eager to preach the gospel of tolerance, how about tolerating me as a Bible-believing Anglican?” A senior clergyman who I was very fond of whispered in my ear in jest, “We use intolerance to shut up people like you so that we can get our agenda through.” I remember thanking him for his honesty.

The truth is, the National Cathedral, in particular, and the Episcopal Church, in general, has rejected the Christian truth of salvation as only possible through Jesus Christ. It is soothing for them, or should I say it is a temporary panacea to their burning conscience, to cover themselves with the cloak of acceptability from other religions. Of course, there are inevitable consequences to their choices and I lovingly and “tolerantly” plead with them to turn and return to the truth before it is too late. I shudder when I think of the consequences of their intolerance of the Gospel of Jesus Christ whose Cross they parade.

I read in the press that a spokesman for the Southern Baptist Convention has appealed to President Obama not to attend the service as a protest for excluding evangelicals and Baptists who represent a third of the U.S. population. I offer them the best of luck on this appeal. President Obama is far fonder of quoting what he calls the “holy Qur’an” than the Bible. He is a man who forgets the Easter proclamation, but never forgets a national proclamation of the month of Ramadan. He is not about to offend his own universalist, syncretistic crowd.

May God have mercy on America. -Michael Youssef

The Intolerance Of The Preachers of Tolerance

The Washington National Cathedral, in its commemoration of the 10th anniversary of 9/11, has deliberately and carefully excluded evangelicals from their multi-religious commemoration. The service includes Buddhists, Hindus, and Muslims, but not evangelical Christians. Mind you, I am opposed to interfaith services in any shape or form and that  is why, in a previous blog, I stated that I was relieved that the Mayor of New York spared us the agony of watching the One, True God of the Bible “worshipped” alongside false gods.

The National Cathedral is a member of the Protestant Episcopal Cathedral Foundation. Having served as an Episcopal Priest in the past for a number of years, the fact that they have excluded evangelicals from their service did not come as a surprise to me at all. Twenty-five years ago, I was one of only a few evangelicals left in that denomination and some of my colleagues labeled me as “narrow-minded” and “intolerant”.  What was my sin? I took Jesus at His word and believed that He and He alone – by dying on the cross and rising again – is the only way to the Father and eternal life in Heaven for all people of all races and religions.

For believing Jesus’ own claim that He is “the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6), I was called “intolerant”. Never mind over 500 years of Anglican history that proclaimed these truths and enshrined them in its Thirty-Nine Articles of Faith. Never mind the many Anglican martyrs who have died defending this truth.

I remember asking the question once, “If you are so eager to preach the gospel of tolerance, how about tolerating me as a Bible-believing Anglican?” A senior clergyman who I was very fond of whispered in my ear in jest, “We use intolerance to shut up people like you so that we can get our agenda through.” I remember thanking him for his honesty.

The truth is, the National Cathedral, in particular, and the Episcopal Church, in general, has rejected the Christian truth of salvation as only possible through Jesus Christ. It is soothing for them, or should I say it is a temporary panacea to their burning conscience, to cover themselves with the cloak of acceptability from other religions. Of course, there are inevitable consequences to their choices and I lovingly and “tolerantly” plead with them to turn and return to the truth before it is too late. I shudder when I think of the consequences of their intolerance of the Gospel of Jesus Christ whose Cross they parade.

I read in the press that a spokesman for the Southern Baptist Convention has appealed to President Obama not to attend the service as a protest for excluding evangelicals and Baptists who represent a third of the U.S. population. I offer them the best of luck on this appeal. President Obama is far fonder of quoting what he calls the “holy Qur’an” than the Bible. He is a man who forgets the Easter proclamation, but never forgets a national proclamation of the month of Ramadan. He is not about to offend his own universalist, syncretistic crowd.

May God have mercy on America. -Michael Youssef

"We The People" Are Corrupt, In Religion And Politics

When Europeans came to India they built schools (there were zero schools in Gujarat before Mountstuart Elphinstone built the first 10 in the 1820s). When Indians go to Europe we build more temples. Patels alone have built 12 Swaminarayan temples in Britain.

Unfortunately, the European is tolerant and the Indian quite shameless, though it’s true also that he’s unaware of what he’s doing. He’s practicing his magic in a culture where it isn’t needed. He doesn’t need God’s favors in a society that isn’t corrupt, that is moral, that is equal. All he needs is hard work, which he’s quite capable of giving. - Aakar Patel

Global political watchdog Transparency International ranks India 87th in the world in terms of corruption, giving Indians the dubious distinction of being among the most corrupt people in the world.

It’s true; we deserve the verdict.

We live in a society where almost everyone and everything is corrupt, from the rat race we run to meet our basic needs - food, shelter, and clothing - to how we aspire to what is higher in politics, education, and even religion.

Religion is probably where it all starts. India is home to all the great religions, but none of them have transformed this country of more than one billion people.

In India religion is a pageant, often a prayer, but rarely a principle.

In our superstitious, caste ridden, money-obsessed culture, the most vulnerable - the poor, women, children, the handicapped - barely survive.

We may be the world’s largest parliamentary democracy, but we have been enslaved in a vicious system, where the powerful systematically loot the country and give lesser Indians the boot.

But that may be changing.

In reaction to unprecedented financial scams on a hitherto unseen scale, a nationwide anti-corruption movement, led by controversial Gandhian crusader Anna Hazare, has taken India by storm and is being hailed as its second freedom movement.

What is happening in India today is a mostly urban frenzy that appears to be peaceful for now, but an enraged citizenry is attempting to bring an elected government to its knees because it is fed up with being ruthlessly exploited.

America and the world’s other democracies should pay close attention to India’s convulsions.

Corruption is suddenly the big story on India’s TV news channels, but Indians know that it is an everyday affair. They can’t stop corruption, because bribe-giving and taking is embedded in the system and in their lives. The "Jan Lokpal" demand for an omniscient, super ombudsman cannot really tackle the evil of dishonesty.

Bribe-takers and givers are not just top bureaucrats and businessmen. They are us: ordinary, corrupt Indians from every level of society.

Nonetheless, the dissent is becoming more strident. It’s obvious that India’s have-nots and its 250 million middle class don’t care if the government falls over their demand for the Jan Lokpal bill. The protest may not play out peacefully as the Congress-led UPA regime considers its options.

Indians have rallied together time and again, but they've just as easily forgotten a Gandhi who was assassinated in 1948 because of a rabid ideology that can still sweep the country; a JP Narayan and his "Total Revolution," who in 1975, without television coverage, attracted hundreds of thousands to his anti-Emergency fight against a power-hungry Indira Gandhi, who suspended India’s democracy for two years; and now a 73-year-old Anna Hazare, who may have let loose demons the country cannot restrain. 

The Congress could have championed this issue, which has galvanized the nation. Instead it has shown incredible folly in managing the protests. Dubbed a dilly-dallying puppet under Sonia Gandhi, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh contends Hazare’s uncompromising demand for a powerful anti-corruption watchdog “is totally misconceived and fraught with grave consequences for our parliamentary democracy."

Singh forgets his Congress Party was in power when the Lokpal bill was first blocked in Parliament as far back as 1968, and the bill was revised and re-introduced in 1971, 1977, 1985, 1989, 1996, 1998, 2001, 2005 and in 2008.

India’s venal politicians successfully stalled the bill for four decades, hence the explosion of public anger today, clearly the biggest upheaval in a country oppressed and subjugated in a democracy subverted by its own leadership.

Remarkably few voices have addressed the moral and spiritual issues that might explain why Indians are so easily enslaved by their politicians, and why the evils of greed, hate and caste continue to keep Indians in bondage.

Columnist Aakar Patel wrote in the Wall Street Journal site, www.livemint.com: “No race can be congenitally corrupt. But can a race be corrupted by its culture? To know why Indians are corrupt let’s look elsewhere. What patterns and practices distinguish us?

“First: Religion is transactional in India.

“We give God cash and anticipate an out-of-turn reward. Our plea acknowledges we aren’t really deserving. The cash compensates for our lack of merit. In the world outside the temple walls, such a transaction has a name: “bribe.”

According to Patel, Indians think, “God accepts cash from us, not good work, for which there is no reward. Why does the wealthy Indian give not cash to temples, but gold crowns and such baubles?

“To ensure his gift isn’t squandered on feeding the poor. Our pay-off is for God. It’s wasted if it goes to man. ...

“In June 2009, The Hindu published a report of Karnataka politician G. Janardhan Reddy gifting a crown of gold and diamonds worth nearly US $10 million to the Tirupati temple” (possibly India’s most revered Hindu shrine).

“Tirupati got 3,200 kilos of silver and 2.4 kg of diamonds in just one year. The temple encourages such giving ... Those who gift a kilo of gold, worth over US $45,000, get a “VIP darshan” (which means cutting the queue) to see the idol.

“In 2007, Vellore’s Sripuram temple was built with 1,500kg of gold. By weight alone it is worth US $70 million."

Patel asks, “When God accepts money in return for his favours, what is wrong with my doing the same thing? Nothing. This is why Indians are so easily corruptible. Our culture accommodates such transactions morally. This is key. There is no real stigma. The demonstrably corrupt Indian leader can harbour hope of a comeback, unthinkable in the West.”

Patel only highlights aberrations in Hinduism, but evidence at other prominent shrines like Our Lady of Vailankanni and Khwaja Syed Muhammad Moinuddin Chishti reveal how India’s peculiar culture of religious bribery has infected other religions.

Religion East or West is not that different. Christianity has produced as much havoc in society as any other religion has in its sphere of influence.

Harvard historian Niall Ferguson's book, Civilization, quotes a scholar from the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences who revealed, “We were asked to look into what accounted for … the success, in fact, the pre-eminence of the West all over the world. We studied everything we could from the historical, political, economic, and cultural perspective. At first we thought it was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past 20 years we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion. Christianity.”

They are wrong. It is the principles of Christ alone, not a religion called Christianity, the consequences of which the West is currently reaping.

Fifty years ago Chairman Mao declared China a religion-free zone. There are now more than 100 million Chinese Christians, exceeding Communist Party members.

The idols of wealth and power the West worshipped for so long are tumbling. It’s time India figured out why.

By Frank Raj
The Washington Times Communities

Note: Frank Raj is based in the Middle East where he has lived for over three decades. He is the founding editor and publisher of ‘The International Indian’, the oldest magazine of Gulf-Indian society and history since 1992. Frank is listed in Arabian Business magazine’s 100 most influential Indians in the Gulf and is co-author of the upcoming publication ‘Universal Book of the Scriptures,’ and author of ‘Desh Aur Diaspora.’ He blogs at www.no2christianity.wordpress.com

A Divorce Notification

Dear Robert,

I’m writing this letter to tell you that I’m leaving you.

I’ve been a good wife to you for the last 20 years, but I have nothing to show for it, and the last two weeks have been pure hell.

And when your boss called to tell me that you left your job, it was the last straw.

Last week, you came home and you didn’t even notice that I had a new hairstyle and that I wore a brand new nightie.

I cooked your favorite meal, which you ate in two minutes, and then you just went straight to bed after watching your favorite TV shows.

You haven’t told me that you love me for so long, I’ve wondered if you still loved me. We have not had any kind of intimacy that connects us as husband and wife. Either you’re cheating on me or you don’t love anymore. Whatever the case maybe, I’m gone.

Your ex-wife,
Elizabeth

PS: Don’t try to find me. Your brother and I are moving together to New Zealand. Have a great life!

THE REPLY:

Dear Liz,

Thank you for your letter which really made my day. It’s true that you and I have been married for 20 years, but you have to admit that a good woman is a far cry from what you’ve been.

In response to the various issues which you raised:

1) I watched TV shows so much because I thought they would drown out your constant whining and bitching. Too bad, it didn’t work.

2) I did notice when you got a new hairdo, but the first thing that came to mind was it made you look like a boy. I had been raised to say nothing, if I can’t say anything nice, so I don’t make any comment.

3) When you cooked “my favorite meal”, you must have forgotten and had me confused with my brother because I have never really liked pork and have not eaten it for at least the past seven years.

4) About the new nightie, I turned away from you because the £49.99 price tag was still on it, and I tried my best to believe that it was just a coincidence that my brother barrowed £50 from me that morning.

After all of the above, believe it or not, I still loved you and thought we could work things out. So, when I won the £20 million Lotto on Saturday, I left my job and bought two tickets for us to go on a holiday in Jamaica, but when I got home you were gone.

Everything happens for a reason, I guess.

I hope you have the fulfilling life you’ve always wanted. Incidentally, my lawyer assured me that the letter you wrote ensures that you won’t get a penny from me. For now, take care.

Your ex-husband (who has just turned rich as hell and free!)
Rob

PS: I don’t know if you’re aware of this, but my brother Carl was originally born Carla. I hope that does not pose any problems.

Author Unknown

Life’s Truisms

1] Prayer is not a spare wheel which one pulls out only when in trouble, but is a steering wheel
which keeps one in the right track through life.

2] A car's windshield is larger while the rear view mirror is smaller because what has past is not as important as the future. So, look ahead and move on.

3] Friendship is like a book. It takes only a few seconds to burn, but it takes years to write it.

4] All things in this present life are temporary. If things are going well, enjoy them because they will not last forever. If things are going wrong, don’t worry because they will not last forever, either.

5] Old friends are like silver and gold while new friends are like diamonds. If and when you get a diamond, don't forget the silver and the gold because a diamond needs a base of silver or gold!

6] When one is tempted to lose hope and think that it is the end, one should remember that it's just a bend in life's road, and the best is yet to come!

7] When one leaves problems with God and allows Him to solve them, one shows faith in His abilities, but when God doesn't solve one's problems after one has left them with Him, He shows faith in one's God-given abilities.

8] To lose one's vision in life is worse than losing one's eyesight.

9] God listens and blesses others when you pray for them; and when you are safe and happy, remember that someone has prayed for you.

10] Worry only takes away today's peace but it does not take away tomorrow's troubles.

Author Unknown

A True Story From San Antonio, Texas

Something really cute happened in downtown San Antonio this week. Michael R. is an accounting clerk at Frost Bank and works there in a second story office. Several weeks ago, he watched a mother duck choose the concrete awning outside his window as the unlikely place to build a nest above the sidewalk. The mallard laid ten eggs in a nest in the corner of the planter that is perched over 10 feet in the air. She dutifully kept the eggs warm for weeks, and Monday afternoon all of her ten ducklings hatched.

Michael worried all night how the momma duck was going to get those babies safely off their perch in a busy, downtown, urban environment to take to water, which typically happens in the first 48 hours of a duck hatching. Tuesday morning, Michael watched the mother duck encourage her babies to the edge of the perch with the intent to show them how to jump off. Office work came to a standstill as everyone gathered to watch.

The mother flew down below and started quacking to her babies above. In disbelief Michael watched as the first fuzzy newborn trustingly toddled to the edge and astonishingly leapt into thin air, crashing onto the cement below. Michael couldn't stand to watch this risky effort nine more times! He dashed out of his office and ran down the stairs to the sidewalk where the first obedient duckling, near its mother, was resting in a stupor after the near-fatal fall. Michael stood out of sight under the awning-planter, ready to help.

As the second one took the plunge, Michael jumped forward and caught it with his bare hands before it hit the concrete. Safe and sound, he set it down it by its momma and the other stunned sibling, still recovering from that painful leap. (The momma must have sensed that Michael was trying to help her babies.)

One by one the babies continued to jump.. Each time Michael hid under the awning just to reach out in the nick of time as the duckling made its free fall. At the scene the busy downtown sidewalk traffic came to a standstill.. Time after time, Michael was able to catch the remaining eight and set them by their approving mother.

At this point Michael realized the duck family had only made part of its dangerous journey. They had two full blocks to walk across traffic, crosswalks, curbs and past pedestrians to get to the closest open water, the San Antonio River , site of the famed "River Walk." The onlooking office secretaries and several San Antonio police officers joined in. An empty copy-paper box was brought to collect the babies. They carefully corralled them, with the mother's approval, and loaded them in the container.. Michael held the box low enough for the mom to see her brood. He then slowly navigated through the downtown streets toward the San Antonio River. The mother waddled behind and kept her babies in sight, all the way.

As they reached the river, the mother took over and passed him, jumping in the river and quacking loudly. At the water's edge, Michael tipped the box and helped shepherd the babies toward the water and to the waiting mother after their adventurous ride.

All ten darling ducklings safely made it into the water and paddled up snugly to momma. Michael said the mom swam in circles, looking back toward the beaming bank bookkeeper, and proudly quacking.

Like all of us in the big times of our life, they never could have made it alone without lots of helping hands.


Author/Photographer Unknown

Muslims See ‘Foreign Law’ Bill As Attack On Shariah


Defenders call it buffer for courts

A national drive against citing “foreign” laws in U.S. courts — one that critics say is a veiled attack on Islamic Shariah law — has reached the state with the nation’s largest concentration of Muslims.

The Michigan bill, which mirrors “American Laws for American Courts” legislation introduced in more than 20 other states, was introduced in June by state Rep. Dave Agema, Grandville Republican. He has argued that it has nothing to do with Islam or the faith’s Koran-based Shariah law, but is designed to stop anyone who seeks to invoke a foreign law in state courts.

Mr. Agema’s proposal has not made it out of committee, but still has raised cries of racism, xenophobia and Islamophobia from groups such as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and the Michigan chapters of the American Civil Liberties Union and the Council of American-Islamic Relations, which have threatened to file a lawsuit if state lawmakers approve the measure.

“If anybody has a problem with this, that means they don’t agree with U.S. laws,” Mr. Agema told the Detroit News. “If they don’t want it passed, then they have an ulterior agenda. It shows the people accusing me of bigotry are guilty of it themselves.”

Mr. Agema did not respond to several requests from The Washington Times to comment on his bill.

Victor Begg, a Republican and senior adviser to the Council of Islamic Organizations of Michigan, calls the legislation “hogwash” and said it is clear there is an underlying agenda. He suggested that such measures moving through more than 20 states are part of an organized and well-funded “witch hunt” and that Islam and Muslim-Americans are the real targets.

“We are appalled that our elected officials would waste their time on something that is unnecessary,” Mr. Begg said, noting Michigan’s economic woes, including one of the nation’s highest jobless rates.

“We are very unhappy that in these days and times that a large number of legislators would target a minority faith like ours. This is reminiscent of what happened to Catholics a century ago. We don’t need to go back to the Dark Ages here. We have built relationships and we do a lot of interfaith work, and we are not into civil rights, filing lawsuits and such.”

Backers of the law say they are reacting to court decisions that have cited either international law or faith-based statutes such as Shariah to help decide cases, instead of relying solely on the Constitution or federal and state laws.

Voters in Oklahoma overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment in November that bans the use of Islamic law in court. In June, Tennessee enacted a law that, as originally written, would have empowered the state attorney general to designate Islamic groups suspected of terrorist activity as “Shariah organizations.”

State legislators in more than 20 states also have introduced anti-foreign-law statutes, although most are still early in the legislative process.

A study by the Center for Security Policy in Washington, D.C., looked at 50 appellate cases from 23 states and found that Shariah law had been applied or formally recognized in court decisions.

Those cases, said Christopher Holton, a vice president at the center, represent the tip of the iceberg in what he describes as a growing conflict in state courts, where many decisions are never publicized.

“There is no question — Shariah principles are finding their way into our courts for years now. It’s inherently discriminatory for women — most of these involved family law. When you get a ruling in a child custody case from Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan or Egypt and it’s family law, it’s all Shariah,” he said.

Mr. Holton argued that American Muslim activist groups and others have employed scare tactics and have mischaracterized the statute against foreign law. “It’s designed to protect constitutional liberties, not designed to go after anyone’s religious practices.”

Saeed Khan, a lecturer in Islamic and Middle Eastern history, politics and culture at Wayne State University in Detroit, called the Michigan legislation a sign of “bigotry and being a bully.” He said many in Michigan’s Muslim community were shocked that such a thing would arise, given the solid relationships built within the state.

“The community has thought that because of its longevity in Michigan, the fact that it has been such a productive and integrated part of the greater society, that for this attack to occur, for it to be targeted in such a particularly way — it’s a false issue in that none of the community members have ever tried to assert the codification of Shariah within the legal system. The community recognizes that many of the principles of Shariah are already addressed or accommodated in state and federal law.”

Mr. Khan argued that much of the drive behind the anti-Shariah statutes was fear of the changing American demographics and the rising prominence of minority groups. While Hispanics, blacks and gays have gained a certain amount of political and social capital over the years, the relatively small Muslim community is an easy target, he said.

“The music has proverbially stopped and the only community that is without a chair is the Muslim-American community,” he said. “It seems to me that a moral panic has set into the country. It is on its way to this irreversible demographic shift. To call someone the ‘M-word’ has replaced the old ‘N-word.’ Muslim-Americans are easy targets in cheap victories.”

Mr. Holton and other supporters of the laws, however, argue that state legislatures have a proper role in defining what policy should be when foreign laws are introduced into state courts. No explicit public policy exists in most state legislatures, he said.

“The case law speaks for itself,” said Stephen Gele, a spokesman for the American Public Policy Alliance and a lawyer practicing in Louisiana. His group is working with state legislatures on the passage of the American Laws for American Courtsbills.

“People should encourage the passage of the [bill] because it protects all Americans from foreign laws or foreign judgments,” he said, encouraging those who may have questions to take time to read the language of those bills.

Too much emotional noise and outrage, he said, have kept people from understanding the legislation.

“I do not believe people should be concerned about the act in the sense that it is discriminatory against any particular religion or that it will lessen anyone’s constitutional rights,” Mr. Gele said. “The arguments that are made against [American Laws for American Courts] are simply refuted by review of the language of the act, which is facially neutral, and explicitly supports constitutional rights including free exercise of religion and the nonestablishment of religion by the government.” -The Washington Times

A Thought To Ponder

It is better to be hated for what you are,
than to be loved for what you are not.


~Author Unknown ~

Sep 11, 2011

9/11 - The 10 Year Anniversary

9/11 Memorial Without Prayer

Hostility to America’s religious heritage surfaces from coast to coast

We’ve got a word for someone who hates Christmas - Grinch. What should we call someone who hates America’s Judeo-Christian heritage, even to the point of barring clergy at a ceremony at the site of a major tragedy?

How about “theophobe”? The word is already out there. You can look it up.

In one special case, we can just call the theophobe “Mayor.” That would be Michael R. Bloomberg, New York’s trendy, formerly Republican leader, who has topped even his own endorsement of a mosque near Ground Zero by forbidding prayer at the upcoming ceremony commemorating the 10th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Maybe Mr. Bloomberg is only selectively theophobic and would consider allowing some Muslim prayers or perhaps an atheistic rant. To be fair, it must be noted that he has not had a problem with the display of the World Trade Center Cross, a 20-foot structure composed of steel beams found that way in the Ground Zero rubble.

But his tone-deaf moral equivalence when it comes to Ground Zero sensibilities is still stunning.

Faced with opposition to the proposed mosque, he said, “I think it’s fair to say if somebody was going to try, on that piece of property, to build a church or a synagogue, nobody would be yelling and screaming.”

No, because it wasn’t Christians or Jews who hijacked jetliners and rammed them into the Trade Center's Twin Towers, killing nearly 3,000 people. That’s kind of an important detail.

The sheer hostility toward America’s Judeo-Christian heritage is manifesting itself in weird ways.

I was on a radio talk show the other day when the otherwise sane and articulate host ventured that people with a religious worldview cannot be expected to have open minds. This would rule out Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein and geneticist Francis Collins, not to mention George Washington, Benjamin Franklin and all the poets from Shakespeare to Robert Frost.

And if it’s true that all religions are equal when it comes to shutting down the mind, why did science uniquely explode in the Christian Western world, as the late Rev. Stanley Jaki so eloquently explained in his book “The Savior of Science”?

Perhaps my talk-show host was drinking from the same fountain as the ever vigilant American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which works ceaselessly to stamp out any public evidence of America’s religious reality. On any given day, the ACLU is yanking Ten Commandments monuments out of the ground or warning schools not to let pesky prayers find their way into football coaches’ motivational speeches.

Earlier this month, the ACLU managed to scare off a Florida panhandle city from providing insurance for a rally honoring the victims of the Sept. 11 attacks. Why? Because God is in the mix.

Threatened with a lawsuit, the Milton City Council decided against providing insurance coverage for the Restoring Faith in God, Country and Patriotism Rally. Money raised for the event was earmarked originally for the Wounded Warrior Project, a charity that aids people injured in the war on terror.

Milton, which lies just northeast of the naval port and airfield at Pensacola, will still host the nondenominational assembly at its high school football stadium to commemorate the 10th anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks. But it will cost more than it should have.

The original plan was to place the event under the city’s blanket insurance coverage, but organizers instead had to purchase two hours’ of coverage for almost $1,000, thanks to the theophobes at the ACLU.

Milton Mayor Guy Thompson, a recipient of an ACLU warning letter, replied with an Aug. 15 letter of his own: “The purpose and intent … is to commemorate the tragic events of Sept. 11, 2001, and to honor and celebrate those who died that day. The City also recognizes the efforts and sacrifices of our service men and women and others who have given so much to protect our nation and keep us safe.”

Yeah, let’s make it harder for cities to sponsor events like this.

In San Diego County, Calif., the ACLU threatened to sue over a $21,000 grant given to the Green Oak Ranch for capital improvements because the ranch is run by a Christian ministry. The ACLU said in an Aug. 2 press release that the grant violated the “No Aid Clause” of the state Constitution, which bars direct aid to religious entities even if the money is for nonreligious purposes.

The ranch has long been used for events involving local governments and charities. In May 2005, for example, the ranch hosted a county-sponsored Foster and Kinship Family Celebration.

The ACLU’s interpretation of the statute, and decisions by liberal courts, discriminate against religious organizations while allowing aid to nonreligious entities. That’s tantamount to an official pro-atheistic policy. This flies in the face of the First Amendment, which bars establishment of religion, including the narrowest faith of all, atheism.

San Diego County Board of Supervisors Chairman Bill Horn, who sponsored the grant, is probably on a wanted poster at ACLU headquarters. His Web page has a photo of him presenting a proclamation honoring the Boy Scouts and another of him observing the National Day of Prayer. A public enemy, to be sure.

Green Oaks is used by many groups, according to its chairman, who told a local news station that “beneficiaries can be religious, nonreligious, atheists, evangelicals; it doesn’t matter.”

Well, it still matters to the ACLU, whose work is never done.

From coast to coast, the liberal hostility to faith knows no bounds. Maybe it’s time for the psychiatric profession to add theophobia to its manual of mental disorders.

It does seem to interfere with normal, rational thinking.

By Robert Knight

Note: Robert Knight is a senior fellow for the American Civil Rights Union (ACRU) and a columnist for The Washington Times. ACRU researcher Greg Rohrbough assisted with this article.

9-11 Memorial
10th Anniversary

"It's far easier to forgive an enemy
after you've got even with him."

~ Olin Miller ~

Pics From Yahoo News

Sep 4, 2011

Ragbag Headliners

New H.I.V. Cases Steady Despite Better Treatment

Despite years of great progress in treating AIDS, the number of new infections with the virus that causes it has remained stubbornly around 50,000 a year in the United States for a decade, according to new figures released on Wednesday by federal officials.

The American epidemic is still concentrated primarily in gay men, and is growing rapidly worse among young black gay men.

That realization is causing a rift in the AIDS community. Activists say the persistent H.I.V. infection rate proves that the government prevention policy is a flop. Federal officials are on the defensive even as they concede that the epidemic will grow if prevention does not get better, which they know is unlikely while their budgets are being cut.

And some researchers believe it is impossible to wipe out a fatal, incurable disease when it is transmitted through sex and carries so much stigma that people deny having it and avoid being tested for it. –Big Health Report

<><><>*<><><>

Addiction: The Disease That Lies

I learned of four addiction-related deaths this weekend. Three were people I knew in Portland, Oregon, recovery circles and the fourth was Amy Winehouse.

Tragically one must get used to such news if you spend a lot of time with those who have this disease. Whenever someone with addiction dies, I grieve the lost potential and wonder about the limitations of our ability to address this cunning, baffling and powerful disease.

I am also humbled by my own experience with addiction and recovery, and grateful for the help I received.

It seems nearly impossible to believe that people with addiction would continue to use drugs and alcohol to the point of death, but that is what people with addiction do:  They  deny both the consequences and the risks of using. As we continue to learn about addiction, we’re understanding  more about  why addicted people behave the way they do. But that’s little solace for friends and family. –Big Health Report
Steven Curtis Chapman
Do Everything (Official Music Video)

Rationalizing Pedophilia in Islam

The commentary below highlights a recent fatwa issued by a top Saudi cleric regarding child brides and sex with female children.

Note this statement from the fatwa, regarding how old girls should be before marriage. Dr. Salih bin Fawzan asserts that “…the only criterion is that they are capable of being placed beneath and bearing the weight of men.”

For those who claim this can’t be happening in America, we have seen reports of Muslim men immigrating to Europe, the UK, and to the United States, and identifying their child brides as relatives, such as daughters, in order to avoid scrutiny from Western laws that prohibit pedophilia.

We have no doubt this is happening here. Just one more example of how sharia law is penetrating and threatening America. –Act For America

^^^*^^^

Earlier this month we saw—or rather, were once again reminded—that Islam permits pedophilia in the guise of "marriage": Top Saudi cleric, Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, issued a fatwa asserting that there is no minimum age for girls to marry, "even if they are in the cradle," and that the only criterion is that "they are capable of being placed beneath and bearing the weight of the men."

While this practice speaks for itself, it is interesting to witness the great lengths some Muslims go to justify or rationalize it—or even to turn it into a source of pride.

Consider, for example, this Muslim cleric discussing Muhammad's marriage to the child Aisha when she was nine. Far from blushing for shame, the cleric actually uses this anecdote to boast of the prophet's "patience" and "magnanimity." Translation of relevant excerpt follows:

The story of the prophet's marriage to Aisha reveals to us aspects like the prophet's conduct with Aisha, and more importantly the aspect regarding the relationship between the husband and wife, to show how one should treat his wife, just as the prophet did with Aisha.

We know that Asia's mother went to take her down from the swing that she was playing on to fix her hair and prepare her for the prophet so he could enter her [have sex with her]—and she did that all on the same day.


Aisha's own account in Sahih Bukhari is telling enough: she talks about how her mother hurriedly prepared her and then "handed" her over to Muhammad, and how "nothing surprised me but the coming of Allah's Apostle to me in the forenoon."

The cleric continues:

So you see, she was playing with her fellow playmates even though her day of consummation was that very same day—and all that they did was to fix her up for the prophet so he could have sex with her.

Now what do we see when the prophet married Aisha? Did he go to her and say "Okay that's it, you're married, you're now a grown up, you're supposed to be mature, you need to do this and that; you need to forget about your toys and your little friends; you are now a wife of a man, you have to see to my needs" and that's it?

No. The prophet allowed her to continue playing with her toy dolls—indeed, the prophet even sometimes gave her such things to play with. [This hadith has more details, including how Aisha's little girl friends would "hide themselves" whenever the prophet came to her until he called them out.]

It should be noted that the cleric recounted the above with much awe and amazement—as if to say, "Look how indulgent and open-minded our prophet was!"

In fact, such was the cleric's whole point: to show that Islam, according to the example of Muhammad, expects older Muslim husbands to be patient with their younger wives: "The older husband should not expect the younger wife to be at his level of maturity; rather, he should go down to her level, for he is capable, whereas she is not."

As "gentlemanly" as this ostensibly sounds, it is yet another example of how Muslim scholars deal with Muhammad's lifestyle: because they cannot condemn or ignore his practices, they inevitably go to great lengths to rationalize or justify them—to find the good in every situation their prophet was involved in, while being oblivious to all the bad.

Thus here we have a cleric straining to find a positive aspect to Muhammad's pedophilia—that he was patient and indulgent of his child-bride—while ignoring the heart of it: that the man Islam is built around desired to have sex with a child in the first place.

By Raymond Ibrahim

Obama Can Not Lose No Matter What

Can President Obama be defeated in 2012? No. He can't. I am going on record as saying that President Barack Obama will win a second term.

The media won't tell you this because a good election campaign means hundreds of millions (or in Obama's case billions) of dollars to them in advertising.

But the truth is, there simply are no conditions under which Barak Obama can be defeated in 2012.

The quality of the Republican candidate doesn't matter. Obama gets reelected. Nine percent unemployment? No problem. Obama will win. Gas prices moving toward five dollars a gallon? He still wins. The economy soars or goes into the gutter. Obama wins. War in the Middle East? He wins a second term.

America's role as the leading Superpower disappears? Hurrah for Barack Obama! The U.S. government rushes toward bankruptcy, the dollar continues to sink on world markets and the price of daily goods and services soars due to inflation fueled by Obama's extraordinary deficit spending? Obama wins handily.

[Many would most probably say]: "You are crazy, Williams! Don't you understand how volatile politics can be when overall economic, government, and world conditions are declining?" Sure I do.

And that's why I know Obama will win. The American people are notoriously ignorant of economics. And economics is the key to why Obama should be defeated.

Even when Obama's policies lead the nation to final ruin, the majority of the American people are going to believe the bait-and-switch tactics Obama and his supporters in the media will use to explain why it isn't his fault. After all, things were much worse than understood when he took office.

Obama's reelection is really a very, very simple math problem. Consider the following:

1) Blacks will vote for Obama blindly. Period. Doesn't matter what he does. It's a race thing. He's one of us;

2) College educated women will vote for Obama. Though they will be offended by this, they swoon at his oratory. It's really not more complex than that;

3) Liberals will vote for Obama. He is their great hope;

4) Democrats will vote for Obama. He is the leader of their party and his coat tails will carry them to victory nationwide;

5) Hispanics will vote for Obama. He is the path to citizenship for those who are illegal and Hispanic leaders recognize the political clout they carry in the Democratic Party;

6) Union members will vote overwhelmingly for Obama. He is their key to money and power in business, state and local politics;

7) Big Business will support Obama. They already have. He has almost $1 Billion dollars in his reelection purse gained largely from his connections with Big Business and is gaining more everyday. Big Business loves Obama because he gives them access to taxpayer money so long as they support his social and political agenda;

8) The media love him. They may attack the people who work for him, but they love him. After all, to not love him would be racist;

9) Most other minorities and special interest groups will vote for him. Oddly, the overwhelming majority of Jews and Muslims will support him because they won't vote Republican. American Indians will support him. Obviously homosexuals tend to vote Democratic; and lastly,

10) Approximately half of independents will vote for Obama. And he doesn't need anywhere near that number because he has all of the groups previously mentioned. The President will win an overwhelming victory in 2012.

By Walter Williams

Dr. Williams is a conservative economist, who currently teaches at George Mason University in Virginia.

^^^*^^^

In addition to the voting blocs, which Dr. Williams had mentioned above, there is another huge group: the nearly one-half of U.S. adults who do not pay taxes, who receive money from the US government. These people do not want to "shake the boat" or do anything to stop the flow of taxpayers' money to their pockets.

Also, Williams either omitted or completely overlooked the "theological" factor that, just as Judas Iscariot betrayed Jesus Christ which led to His death on Calvary and the full implementation of "God's plan of salvation". . .Obama is [probably] the designated modern 21st century Judas, who will betray the USA and the world in order for the long-awaited "end of the world" and "second coming of Jesus Christ" which has been preached by various Christian churches and groups for more than 100 years to finally become reality.

^^^*^^^

Joseph Olson, law professor at Hamline University School of Law in St. Paul, Minnesota, points out some interesting and significant facts concerning the 2008 presidential election:

> Number of States won by: Obama: 19 ; McCain: 29
> Square miles of land won by: Obama: 580,000 ; McCain: 2,427,000
> Population of counties won by: Obama: 127million ; McCain: 143 million
> Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Obama: 13.2 ; McCain: 2.1

Unfortunately, in the USA, the reality is, even if the majority of the people had voted for McCain, the final determining factor on who eventually becomes the U.S. President depends upon the results of the "final voting" at the U.S. Electoral College.

Professor Olson adds:

"In aggregate, the map of the territory McCain won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country. The Obama territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in low income tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..."

Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of the Tyler definition of democracy, with some 40 percent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.

If Congress grants amnesty and U.S. citizenship to the 20 million illegal immigrants, and if they vote, then [it is predicted that] one can bid goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years!

A Frickin Elephant

A bunch of five-year old kindergarteners were being taught how to read using the "Hooked on Phonics" method. A precocious kid and the best reader in the class pointed to a picture of a zoo in a book that he was reading and exclaimed, "Look at this! It is a frickin' elephant!"

The teacher held her breath upon hearing the little one's description of the animal. Then, the teacher asked,

"What did you say?"

"A frickin' elephant. It says so in the picture," the kid repeated.

The teacher could not believe her ears! There's no way such an adjective would be printed on a kindergarten book! To satisfy her curiosity, she approached the kid and asked him to show where it said "a frickin elephant"!

To the teacher's surprise, so it did.


" African Elephant "
[a frickin elephant]

Hooked on phonics!
A wonderful way to teach little kids how to read.

Author/Source Unknown

"Religious" Movies


"That which we have seen and heard, we declare to you, that you also may have fellowship with us; and truly our fellowship is with the Father and with His Son Jesus Christ. And these things we write to you that your joy may be full." -1 John 1:3-4

Someone recently asked me, "What is your favorite 'religious' movie?"

Without hesitation, I said "Ben-Hur." No doubt about it. Fabulous movie. Probably not considered "religious" in the minds of most people.

Up until my 26th year, I had not had a personal relationship with Jesus Christ. However, I still probably would have cited "Ben-Hur" as my all-time favorite movie. And I would NOT have considered it "religious," either, at the time. When I watch "Ben-Hur" now, yes, I see the power and dominance of Imperial Rome; the laws and tradition of Judaism; then, the totally new ideals of Jesus Christ; and the conflict within the heart of the central character, Judah Ben-Hur (portrayed my Charlton Heston), to deal with these new ideals.

I don't think "Ben-Hur" was put on the market to be perceived as a "religious" film. No, "Ben-Hur" was put on the market as blockbuster movie release...with big-name stars, a huge budget, pageantry...and, oh, that chariot race! "Ben-Hur" attracted a broad-based demographic...men and women of all ages and children, too. There was something in the movie that appealed to and both sexes and all ages. EVERYONE flocked to the box office to see it on the big screen in 1959. Moviegoers weren't disappointed. What a sensational film. It won 11 Academy Awards.

However, I have to wonder if the producer, or someone in a leadership position involved with this timeless classic, didn't have a more important agenda. Because, the true, lasting significance of the movie, in my opinion today, goes beyond all the typical box office success. For, although we never see His face, the movie shows us Jesus standing on a hillside surrounded by thousands of people listening to His new message. We hear people wonder at the words this new Teacher. We see Him pause in a desert outpost to give water to a chained prisoner...we see the same prisoner return the favor while Christ struggles to carry His cross..."I know this man!" Charlton Heston says as he rushes to His aid. Then, we see Ben-Hur's mother and sister miraculously healed of leprosy as they finally understand who this man, Jesus, really is.

The final scene of the movie places us behind the cross that was erected on Calvary. We see the shadowed outline of Jesus' limp, dead body. As the camera tilts and moves down, it begins to rain. The blood of Christ intermingles with the rainwater and we clearly see it run down to the base of the cross into small rivulets beneath the cross, which become small streams, then larger streams, and finally great rivers. The message is clear - the cleansing redemption of Christ's sacrifice is intended to wash and heal all persons of the world forever. A movie that appears to be about the great manmade power and dominance of the Roman Empire ends up bringing to the viewer the redemptive message of a loving Savoir who offers to change the life of every person in the world. "Ben-Hur," the movie, is a ministry in itself - it does what church should do - it appeals to everybody and offers a powerful message of hope in an interest-generating package.

Our lives, too, are intended by God, I believe, to appeal to a broad base of friends and acquaintances...so that they can see in us the living, redeeming Lord...that their "joy may be full," too.

Written by Jim Coleman

* * *

PRAYER:

Lord, I want to be a box office success for YOU. I want people to see in me something that is irresistible - Your loving Spirit. Use me in this way, O Lord. Amen.

* * *

Jesus is attractive. Do you remember the circumstance or the person who brought Him to your attention? How can you become more attractive for Jesus?

Brought to you by A Positive Minute From The Hour Of Power