Jun 26, 2011

What If Jesus Ran As A Republican For President In 2012?

It is a compelling hypothetical: Back in 30 AD, Jesus was a controversial figure. He was gaining followers but it wasn’t universally agreed upon that he was, in fact, the “Son of Man.” That would be an understatement. So how would the media perceive his candidacy as a Republican candidate?

 As a deeply religious man, Jesus would have been the subject of immediate attack by the mainstream media. Newsweek would probably have ridiculed him on its cover – as they did Mitt Romney this week – dancing in too-short robes and a holy Bible in his hand. Headline: “The Jesus Moment.” Maybe there would have been a Broadway musical mocking Christians to boot.

Jesus was also white i.e. of Jewish descent, and male, which would have made him a perfect target of the cultural elite. His intelligence would have been questioned (due to his “cave-dweller” religious beliefs), he would be attacked as a misogynist (because he is a man), and for his bigoted character (assumed because he is white and of Jewish descent).

Because Jesus chose to associate himself with sinners and outcasts of every kind, his personal life would have been fodder for the media’s attacks. But he didn’t worry about gossip or bad press and, without apology, spent his time among lepers, prostitutes, adulterers, drunkards, tax collectors, thieves, idolaters, and murderers. AOL/Huffington Post would have had a field day with and the New York Times would have led with a headline like, “GOP’s Jesus Fancies Thieves, Prostitutes.”

To make matters worse media-wise, Jesus had twelve male disciples and one female disciple, if you count Mary Magdalene. According to Luke 8:2 and Mark 16:9, Jesus cleansed Magdalene of “seven demons” – indicating to scholars that she was either full of sin or illness. Some have argued that she was literally a repentant “prostitute.” Others argue that Magdalene is merely the victim of historical defamation.  Regardless, you can already hear what MSNBC’s Chris Matthews would have said: “Come on, he’s [Jesus] living with twelve men and a woman? The man’s a nutcase.” Ed Schultz would have chimed in calling Magdalene a “right-wing slut” as he did conservative radio show host Laura Ingraham just weeks ago.

With his stunning rhetorical skills, Jesus would have stirred GOP audiences, much like Sarah Palin did in 2008. What would he have said? While it is impossible to analyze Jesus’ political philosophy in the course of a single article, his belief in the significance of free will, a God-centered society, and individual responsibility is undeniable.

Ever since Karl Marx advocated a collectivist approach to organizing society, progressives have, through “social justice” propaganda, attempted to convert Jesus’ philosophy of voluntary giving into socialism.  However, Jesus was not a socialist. He believed in free will, not government-forced “goodness.” For instance, in Matthew 10:8, Jesus says, "Freely you have received, freely give. In 2 Corinthians 9:7, the Apostle Paul confirms this point, stating, “Each of you should give what you have decided in your heart to give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver.”

Jesus advocated a truly voluntary heart for a reason: because that is what benefits the soul. He wasn't for government interference. He definitely wasn't for the equalization of wealth. And there's the proof.

Jesus addresses the issue of wealth redistribution directly in the Parable of the Talents (Matthew 25:14-28). In this parable, Jesus speaks of three servants who were each given their master’s talents (money) to manage while he went on a journey.  Two of the servants made their talents grow but the third did not. When the master returned and saw that the third servant failed to manage his talent, he commanded that the money be taken from him and given to the other servant. “Take the talent from him and give it to the one who has the ten talents,” said the Master. “For everyone who has will be given more, and he will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what he has will be taken from him.” Jesus advocates aggressive charity but he also advocates – just as aggressively – individual responsibility.

Jesus’ teaching is consistent with property rights as they are generally defined in the Bible. In Genesis 2:15, the “Lord God took man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it.” In Exodus 20:15, 17, the Ten Commandments firmly establish laws against theft and coveting (desiring) your neighbor’s goods. Consequently, property has value and there is a demarcation between the goods one possesses and the goods of everyone else.

Needless to say, Jesus would probably have been a crowd pleaser at Monday’s New Hampshire Republican debate.

But in the end, the media’s personal attacks on Jesus might still have had their intended effect. His poll numbers would probably have plummeted. He would have been seen as a risky candidate by the GOP Establishment. Republican voters say they want a more “impressive” field of presidential candidates. They say they want an iconic personality. A force of nature. But they are also a risk-adverse demographic and generally shift towards so-called “vanilla” candidates, like Gov. Tim Pawlenty, who are harder for the media to attack.

So what GOP candidate could ever hope to pass muster in a bigoted, anti-Christian, hate-filled media environment like this?

 Only heaven knows. –Read more at The Washington Times

Conservative satirist and commentator William J. Kelly is also a contributor to the American Spectator, Breitbart.com and edits the Tea Party Reports for the Washington Times Communities. He is a native from Chicago's Southside.
Automated Catholic Confessional

A Friend Indeed

"No one, when he has lit a lamp, puts it in a secret place or under a basket, but on a lamp stand, that those who come in may see the light." -Luke 11:33

I received a call today from a friend I've come to know over the past year or so. We don't speak often and only see each other perhaps every three or four months. He's involved in a wonderful ministry on the other side of town, so we do not cross paths unless we deliberately choose to do so. What I find so wonderful in this casual friendship is that, in so many ways, we are closer than brothers are. When I pick up the phone and hear his voice, I know instantly that someone cares...that he, in particular, cares about me.

Today's call was not about what's going on in ministry, or about how my family is doing. I know he cares about those things, as well. Today's call was much different. The question was simple, "How is God blessing you, Jim? How are YOU, today?"

My friend is the embodiment of Luke 11:33. He has chosen to light his lamp for Christ and pour himself into the lives of others. When he calls, there is always a caring ear, or laughter to share joy, or a prayer to lift my spirits.

Friends, you may have lit the lamp of Christ in your life, but have you placed it on a lamp stand for all to see? Are you pouring yourself into the lives of others? Are you a listening ear to those you know who are hurting? Are you sharing their pain as well as their joy? Hold your lamp high today! Take this short devotion as your wake-up call to be a blessing to someone you know who needs the attention that only you can give today.

Let God use you, and your light will shine like never before!

Prayer:

Heavenly Father, thank You for reminding me that I need not only to light my lamp, but also to place it high on a lamp stand for Your sake. Show me to the person, today, that You want me to bless with Your love. In Jesus' name, I pray. Amen.

* * *

Who is that person God is calling you to bless?

By Jim Penner, Crystal Cathedral Ministries
February 20, 2011

The Abortion Industry’s War On Choice

When women preserve their babies, abortionists don’t get paid

There is a new war on choice in this country, and the leaders are none other than the captains of the abortion industry. Their target: pregnancy care centers (PCCs). Their technique: Brand the centers with a “scarlet letter” and force them to advertise abortion. Their goal: disparage the centers and drive women to abortion clinics.

It’s no wonder. Pregnancy care centers - and the compassionate and nonjudgmental services they offer - undercut the abortion industry’s bottom line. If women hear the truth about abortion and understand that they truly have a life-affirming choice, the abortion industry’s profits will decrease.

Take Megan, for example. When she found out she was pregnant, she felt scared and confused and believed everything she had been told: “Having a baby will ruin your life.” She made an appointment for a medical abortion, thinking that would ease her worries. But as the date approached, her anxiety only worsened - that is, until she visited a pregnancy center in Pittsburgh.

“The visit to the pregnancy care center changed my life,” Megan said. The care and information she received at the center was “about empowerment, guidance and support.” For the first time, she felt she had choices and could make a genuine, confident decision. “When I left [the center], I realized that the pit in my stomach was gone.” She gave birth to a baby girl she named Ava. Her story is shared in a 2009 pregnancy service report published by Family Research Council titled “A Passion to Serve, a Vision for Life.”

Then there is Sarah. She describes herself as “like any normal college freshman, just enjoying being young and carefree” - until she was raped one night at a party and found out a few weeks later that she was pregnant. Fortunately, her roommate told her about a local pregnancy center in Liberty, Mo. As Sarah recalls, “At the center, they sat down with me, they listened to me, and they helped me think through all of my available options. I was so thankful for how much information they had to offer. … After giving birth to a beautiful baby girl, I was able to place her in the arms of a loving couple who I knew would adore her and provide for her as their own.” Sarah now shares her story to support the services provided by the national organization Care Net on its “Success Stories” Web page.

The abortion industry is desperate to trap women such as Megan and Sarah within its “you must abort or lose your freedom” mantra. Two women, two choices - and lost profits from two abortions that weren’t performed.

Enter the “scarlet letter” campaign. The most recent effort by the abortion industry is to force its competition in the pro-life community to push an abortion message, requiring pregnancy care centers to post signs about abortion. Smearing the centers with false claims about the nature and accuracy of the information they make available, the abortion industry is pushing for the passage of ordinances across the nation that would require pro-abortion speech inside the walls of such centers.

In Baltimore, a recently enacted ordinance requires that pregnancy centers post signs alerting clients that the centers do not provide or refer for abortion. A federal district court in Maryland already has found the forced abortion messages to be unconstitutional violations of the free-speech rights of the centers. Recently, Americans United for Life filed an amicus brief in the appeal of the case, detailing the professional and compassionate care offered by national organizations such as Care Net, Heartbeat International, the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates and their affiliates and refuting the patently false and politically motivated claims being made by the abortion industry against these centers.

What is obvious from the Baltimore litigation as well as litigation in New York over a similar New York City ordinance is that the abortion industry has no regard for women like Megan and Sarah who want to carry their pregnancies to term. The abortion lobby does not want women to know they have choices. When women receive truthful information about their choices, abortion profits decrease.

What also is evident from the Baltimore case is that the abortion industry feels increasingly threatened by the life-affirming care and counseling provided at pregnancy care centers. Desperate and having no other option, all the abortion lobby is left with is to attempt to smear the good name of organizations focused on helping women and their children.

Mailee Smith is staff counsel of Americans United for Life.
The Washington Times

The Indian And The Jew

One day, an Indian (from India) went to a Jewish-owned store which specialized in women's lingerie. He bought 25 size 38D black bras. As a typical Jew known for acute business sense and excellent salesmanship, the store owner sold each bra for $50 after convincing the Indian that size 38D black bras are uncommon and difficult to obtain.

A week or so later, the Indian was back. This time, he ordered 50 more size 38D black bras. As a typical Jew known for being endowed with superior business talent, this time, the store owner told the Indian that since the earlier transaction, size 38D black bras had become more uncommon and harder to obtain. So, he charged the Indian $65 for each one.

Another couple of weeks or so later, the Indian was back once more. This time, he ordered 150 of size 38D black bras. And once more, being an extraordinarily astute business entrepreneur, the Jew informed the Indian that size 38D black bras have become even more difficult to get. So, he charged the Indian $75 for each one.

As the Indian was about to leave the store with his latest purchase, it dawned on the Jew that for some reason, the Indian willingly paid whatever price the Jew quoted. This aroused the Jew's curiosity. So, before the Indian could make it out the door, the Jew asked the Indian the reason as to why all that number of size 38D black bras and his willingness to pay whatever price was asked.

The Indian replied: "Well, you see, I own a little business myself. I specialize in caps and hats. One day, while thinking of how to expand my business, and a great idea came to mind. I decided to try the novel idea. As the old saying says: 'Nothing tried, nothing gained!' After the first time I came to your store and bought the bras, to my surprise, I found that they proved to be a really hot-selling item."

Now even more curious than ever, the Jew queried: "Really? How could that be?"

The Indian answered: "Well, you see, I cut off the bra straps; next, I cut the bra in half; finally, I neatly trimmed off all materials around each cup so that it looked like a cap. And then I sold each cup as yarmulke [the Jewish skullcap] to Jews for $200 each."

Author Unknown
Awe The Summer
Time To Hit The Beach
Have A Safe One!

Jun 19, 2011

This Weeks Sound Off

Between the ages of twelve and fourteen I was hospitalized in a sanitarium where I underwent shock therapy. Beginning at 8 AM the medical team would enter my room, give me an injection, attach leads to my temples, place a tongue guard in my mouth, and then proceed to shock my brine for the next two hours. Once completed I was given a warm sweet surgery drink and then heavily medicated. This treatment lasted for two years. It was hell on earth!

My father was a prominent minister in the Seventh-day Adventist Church and he wasn’t about having a "queer son". Therefore, to save face with the denomination he sent me away to be “cured”. He would occasionally visit, stay for about fifteen minutes, then leave. His visits were primarily to discuss my treatment plan with my physicians. As for physically visiting with me, honestly, I really don’t recall his presence at all.

Though forbiddened, my mother would visit once a week. In order to visit she would have to sneak out of the house, travel for two hours by train and taxi to reach the sanitarium. She would sit with me for about two or three hours then make her journey home. Due to being drugged, I really don’t remember much about her visits, but I knew she was there. On occasions my father would find out and order her to never see me without his permission. Regardless, my mother faithfully visited.

My father and mother never visited me together. Instead, he would bring my step-mother … they were not married at the time.

At the ripe age of nine I knew that something was different about me. I wasn’t sure as to what or why, nevertheless I knew in my heart that I had attractions towards men. At the age of ten I experienced my first sexual encounter with a man and it was then I realized I was attracted to the same sex. No, I didn't understand it, but I knew. And for the next two years I was sexually involved with this man ... his name was Hiroshi. Our relationship lasted three years.

One day my father came to me and asked if I was having sex with Hiroshi. Since I was taught not to lie I told him the truth. Yes! He became angry and then proceeded to beat me with the sowing machine belt until my back and buttocks was raw and bleeding. While beating me he told me that he loved me, that Jesus loved me, but because of my sin he and Jesus could not love me unless I asked forgiveness and never had sex with another man. Naturally, I apologized to stop the beating and from that day forward I never engaged sexually with another man because it was more important to be loved by my father and Jesus rather than experiencing the rather of both. However, deep down inside I was struggling and the more I struggled the feelings I was dealing with intensified to which I finally gave in. Shortly thereafter I was shipped off to the sanitarium to be “cured”.

After two years of excruciating pain and torment I was released. I returned home to resume a “normal” life along with counseling. And for the next five years I behaved myself for fear I would be returned to hell on earth, the sanitarium. I turned my attention to girls cause it was the right and expected thing to do.

It was in boarding academy that I had my third encounter with another man ... his name was Mike. However, the quilt and torment that followed was agonizingly painful. After my encounter with Mike I would shower for an hour to clean myself off. And for four years I lived life in constant fear of not being saved, as well as being found out.

Finally, I came to the point where I had enough. I concluded that since I wasn’t savable, that my father would hate me, and society would reject me it would be better for me to end my life and one afternoon I unsuccessfully attempted suicide.

For years I prayed asking God to remove these “unnatural” desires from my life. I would attend retreats, seek counseling, date girls, do whatever it took to erase a side of me that was deemed unnatural and sinful. I struggled with every ounce of my being to become "normal", however the change I so desperately wanted and sought never came about.

While laying in bed recovering I opened my bible and read the following passage; "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart; I appointed you as a prophet to the nations." -Jeremiah 1:5 NIV

After reading this verse I realized that God knew ahead of time as to the type of life I would live. He knew that I would be different. That I would be hated and rejected, and still He allowed me to come into this world just as I was meant to be.

Not long afterwards my father took me to the back door, opened it, pushed me through, then closed and locked the door. Through the window my father's last words were; "You'll never amount to anything. Never set foot in my house again". I was sixteen, on the streets and left to fend for myself.

From that point forward I never looked back. Instead, I focused forward and chose to live my life not as a gay man, but a man with conviction that it’s not important to seek God’s favor by changing who I was. After all, He had so wonderfully created me and it was up to me to live my life to the best of my ability.

Today, I am at peace with God and myself concerning my sexual orientation. My sexual orientation or preference is a none-issue! I sincerely do not believe that either being straight or gay is an issue with God. It’s more about the walk and how we live our lives with all that we are given that God cares most about. Instead, it’s man that gives importance to whether one is straight or gay. And because of manmade rules, many suffer needlessly at the hands of the church and it’s members.

One day Christian’s will have to give account to God for how they treated their children who are different. Many Christian parents cast their children out of their lives to avoid the shame it would bring to their status in the church. Likewise, churches have turned their backs on individuals who struggle daily with their orientation. The religious community as a whole has spiritually and emotional murdered the tender souls of thousands of gays and lesbians simply because they were offensive and evil. All I can say is shame on you!

In the end, the church and it’s membership will have a great deal to answer for. This silly notion that everyone has to be straight in order to be saved is the most ridiculous theory ever concocted ... it's not even scriptural!

Yes, over the years things have changed. However, it is mainly the religious community who continues to observe this bazaar notion that being gay is an abomination to God … to this is say, bullshit!

By no means, is my story unique. Countless others have endured the same fate. What I’ve shared with you is just a small slice of my life and all that I endured. Honestly, I’m really surprised that I’ve survived. Yes, I’ve had to deal with the damage, however with counseling life has become a peaceful place to be. And I can honestly say with utter conviction that God has blessed me in ways unimaginable and I know beyond the shadow of a doubt that He is constantly nearby and continues to move in my life.

I am God’s design. I am wonderfully created and it is He that will make all things right and perfect in the end. And till that day when I see Him face to face I will live my life as He so saw fit even before I was an apple in my daddies eyes. The cross that was mine, I no longer carry … It is well with my soul.

LGBT In School: 'I Lost A Lot Of My Friends'

"Mama thinks you're gay," Tempest Cartwright's younger sister told her as they walked to Wendy's one day.

"That's ... 'cause I am," Tempest, who was 15 at that time, told her. And with that admission, relief and joy flooded over Tempest. She'd spent much of her life hiding how she felt about girls; she'd made sure to have a boyfriend whenever she could, but secretly would inevitably have a crush on his mother.

Eventually she told her father about her sexuality, and then her mother. Both support her fully. "I felt like I was really me for the first time ever," she recalls.

But once word got around in school, Tempest's peers broke the spell of happiness.

"I lost a lot of my friends," including her ex-boyfriend, who was also her bandmate. People at church stopped talking to her; she started hearing the word "faggot" in the hallways at school.

"I had a while that I went through a big phase of depression about it," said Tempest, now 17. "I tried to keep myself around the people I knew loved me. I just tried to focus out all the negative."

With more and more high schoolers like Tempest speaking out about the mistreatment they face because of their sexuality, and reports of bullying and harassment becoming more commonplace, the federal government is paying more attention to the issue.

The government's focus on it is an important step forward in the long, tortured road of gaining equality for young people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered or questioning, although there is still much work to be done.

Two pieces of legislation in Congress, the Safe Schools Improvement Act and the Student Nondiscrimination Act, give the sense that "they're really pushing to make this a priority," says Liz Owen, director of communications at PFLAG National (Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays).

At the first Federal LGBT Youth Summit that took place in Washington this week, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius spoke about the government's efforts to curb bullying of these students, such as her department's LGBT Coordinating Committee; a new work group to address the needs of LGBT youth and their families; and the website StopBullying.gov.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also just released the largest government report to date on the topic of lesbian, gay and bisexual youth and risky health behaviors. It found that these teens are more likely to engage in substance use, behaviors related to attempted suicide or that contributed to violence, among other things.

Study authors say lack of acceptance from friends and family is the likely culprit. Discrimination, disapproval from families and social rejection at school can all contribute to these outcomes, said Laura Kann of the CDC's Division of Adolescent and School Health, and lead author of the report.

This corroborates what many smaller studies have found, including research from the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN). The group's analysis found that LGBT students are less likely to want to continue education beyond high school if they are experiencing victimization.

A rocky road to acceptance

The growing federal interest in researching the issue of LGBT discrimination in schools is a "very good sign, but I think it's because we've had to go to such extremes of suicide and other traumas before they finally take this population seriously," says Chris Kraft, co-director of Clinical Services at the Sexual Behaviors Consultation Unit at Johns Hopkins University.

It was violence that made gay activism explode in the United States: The Stonewall riots of 1969, when a police raid at a bar in New York spurred gays to fight back. The event empowered people who weren't into exclusively dating members of the opposite sex to be more open about their identity.

But that didn't stop the discrimination, stigma or physical assaults.

In 1998, Matthew Shepard, a gay teenager, died after being kidnapped and severely beaten in Wyoming. President Barack Obama named a 2009 expanded federal hate crimes law after Shepard and James Byrd Jr., a black man who was chained behind a pickup and dragged to death in Texas.

Another death that sparked outrage and united LGBT activists was that of Lawrence "Larry" King in 2008. The boy, 15, was shot by another student at E.O. Green Junior High School in Oxnard, California.

Suicides have also drawn attention to the gravity of the issue. Tyler Clementi, a student at Rutgers University, took his own life after two students allegedly videotaped a same-sex sexual encounter and streamed it online. His family agreed to allow Clementi's name to be used in proposed federal anti-harassment legislation.

The Trevor Project was founded in 1998 in response to the need for help for depressed young people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered or questioning. It began with the creators of the short film "Trevor," about gay 13-year-old boy who attempts to take his own life.

And columnist Dan Savage started the It Gets Better Project in 2010 to show young people that school may be hard, but life does bring happiness in spite of the hardships of social rejection.

Heather Storm James, Tempest's mother, remembers reading about the high incidence of suicide among LGBT youth when Tempest showed signs of depression after being rejected by some of her peers and family members.

"It scared me to death. I really pushed myself to talk to her and make her open up and share her feelings because I didn't want her to become depressed to the point that she would feel like she needed to take her own life, or she was so rejected that nobody loved her," James said.

"My biggest advice to anyone whose child has come out to them is to, first of all, not think so much about your own feelings," she added. "... Not to just automatically reject them, because they really need our acceptance as parents."

TV brings role models

There have also been positive forces in bringing LGBT acceptance issues to the forefront.

MTV's "The Real World: San Francisco" had an HIV-positive cast member, Pedro Zamora, back in the early '90s. He died in 1994. "My So-Called Life" had prominent gay character "Rickie" Vasquez, who had to deal with his sexuality on the show. NBC's comedy "Will & Grace," which premiered in 1998, is another cultural milestone.

Ellen Degeneres has made significant strides in bringing LGBT issues out in the open, and being a positive role model for young people. She came out on her ABC sitcom "Ellen" and in Time magazine in 1997, and she became active in the Trevor Project.

These days, the show "Glee" is giving significant time to exploring issues of gay bullying and acceptance in high school. In a recent episode, character Kurt Hummel broke down in tears after being elected prom queen by unsympathetic classmates, but then accepted the honor with dignity.

"There's been momentary stepping back, but ultimately I think we are moving forward as a society," said Daryl Presgraves, communications director at GLSEN.

Substance abuse

The CDC report found that lesbian, gay and bisexual teens have a higher likelihood of using alcohol and drugs. This is no surprise to Brendon O'Rourke, 27, of Los Angeles, California.

O'Rourke remembers getting picked on in junior high and high school even before he came out. Gym class would be full of taunts like "girly-man" and other verbal attacks.

"Lack of confidence, being different and being gay puts a bull's-eye on you," he said. "They're going to go after the person that's already kind of down on themselves, it's just an easy target."

He began drinking right before prom; he liked that it made him feel comfortable and desirable. In college, he arranged his class schedule so that he wouldn't have to go anywhere in the mornings, so that he could drink into the night. Sometimes during night classes, he'd replace half of a Snapple bottle with vodka. In high school he didn't have friends; in later years, they'd come and go.

"You're left with yourself and in your head, and drinking or taking other substances will completely relieve that pain temporarily and help you forget about that, but then there's a time when that stops working," he said.

His drinking problem led him to cocaine, and then to crystal meth. It took him until age 25 to sober up completely, after being arrested and going into rehab.

"Turning to drugs and alcohol never solves the problem. It might hide feelings, and take away pain, but it never fixes the problem," said O'Rourke, who now works on the technical side of Treatment4Addiction.com. "Finding someone to talk to and work through the problems that you're having is the healthiest solution."

Finding a place

Craig Cassey, 19, who's openly gay and just graduated from high school, has known people who have sought alcohol as a means of coping because of the added stress. A cross country and track athlete, Cassey encourages teens looking for an outlet to seek activities such as sports teams as a means of finding acceptance.

Tempest, who loves art and puts rainbow colors in her Mohawk-styled hair, thought she'd found a new school group where she'd fit in about a month and a half ago -- a Christian club at her school that her girlfriend's friends had joined. Once they found out about that she and her girlfriend were dating, the meetings suddenly turned to the topic of homosexuality -- specifically, that Tempest was going to hell.

"They made my girlfriend cry in front of everybody," she said.

Still, Tempest continues her work as an advocate. She is active in many national organizations, including GLSEN, the Trevor Project and Openarms Youth Project. The Gay Straight Alliance at her school, of which she is the president, works with a local equality center.

LGBT-related posters get torn down a lot in Tempest's area, so she and fellow advocates spend a lot of time putting them back up.

"After a while either they'll get tired of tearing it down, or it'll show them that we're not stopping just because you're going to hate," she said.

If you're a lesbian, gay, bisexual or questioning young person in trouble, call the Trevor Project crisis line at 866-4-U-TREVOR. –CNN Health

Therapy To Change 'Feminine' Boy Created A Troubled Man, Family Says

Kirk Andrew Murphy seemed to have everything to live for.

He put himself through school. He had a successful 8-year career in the Air Force. After the service, he landed a high profile position with an American finance company in India.

But in 2003 at age 38, Kirk Murphy took his own life.

A co-worker found him hanging from the fan of his apartment in New Delhi. His family has struggled for years to understand what happened.

"I used to spend so much time thinking, why would he kill himself at the age of 38? It doesn't make any sense to me," said Kirk's sister, Maris Murphy. "What I now think is I don't know how he made it that long."

After Kirk's death, Maris started a search that would uncover a dark family secret. That secret revealed itself during a phone conversation with her older brother Mark, who mentioned his distrust of any kind of therapy.

"Don't you remember all that crap we went through at UCLA?" he asked her. Maris was too young to remember the details, but Mark remembered it vividly as a low point in their lives.
Wanting a 'normal life'

Kirk Murphy was a bright 5-year-old boy, growing up near Los Angeles in the 1970s. He was the middle child, with big brother Mark, 8, and little sister Maris, just a baby at 9 months. Their mother, Kaytee Murphy, remembers Kirk's kind nature, "He was just very intelligent, and a sweet, sweet, child." But she was also worried.

"Well, I was becoming a little concerned, I guess, when he was playing with dolls and stuff," she said. "Playing with the girls' toys, and probably picking up little effeminate, well, like stroking the hair, the long hair and stuff. It just bothered me that maybe he was picking up maybe too many feminine traits." She said it bothered her because she wanted Kirk to grow up and have "a normal life."

Then Kaytee Murphy saw a psychologist on local television.

"He was naming all of these things; 'If your son is doing five of these 10 things, does he prefer to play with girls' toys instead of boys' toys?' Just things like this," she said.

The doctor was on TV that day, recruiting boys for a government-funded program at the University of California, Los Angeles.

"Well, him being the expert, I thought, maybe I should take Kirk in," said Kaytee Murphy. "In other words, nip it in the bud, before it got started any further."

Kirk becomes 'Kraig'

Kaytee Murphy took Kirk to UCLA, where he was treated largely by George A. Rekers, a doctoral student at the time.

In Rekers' study documenting his experimental therapy (PDF), he writes about a boy he calls "Kraig." Another UCLA gender researcher confirmed that "Kraig" was a pseudonym for Kirk.

The study, later published in an academic journal, concludes that after therapy, "Kraig's" feminine behavior was gone and he became "indistinguishable from any other boy."

"Kraig, I think, certainly was Rekers' poster boy for what Rekers was espousing for young children," said Jim Burroway, a writer and researcher who has studied Rekers' work.

"We have been wondering where is Kraig? A lot of us have talked about it. Where is he today? Is he married or is he gay? Or specifically does he even know that Rekers has been writing about him?" said Burroway. "I found 17 different articles, books, chapters, that he has written in which he talked about Kraig."

Rekers' work with Kirk Murphy helped him build a three-decade career as a leading national expert in trying to prevent children from becoming gay, a career as an anti-gay champion that would later be tainted by his involvement in an embarrassing scandal.

The experiments

The therapy at UCLA involved a special room with two tables where "Kraig's" behavior was monitored, according to the study.

"There was a one-way mirror or one-way window -- and some days they would let him choose which table he would go to," said Maris, who has read about the experiments.

At one table Kirk could choose between what were considered masculine toys like plastic guns and handcuffs, and what were meant to be feminine toys like dolls and a play crib. At the other table, Kirk could choose between boys' clothing and a toy electric razor or items like dress-up jewelry and a wig.

See details about the experimental therapy

According to the case study, Kaytee Murphy was told to ignore her son when he played with feminine toys and compliment him when he played with masculine toys.

"They pretty much told him he wasn't right the way that he was, but they never really explained it to him what the issue was. They did it through play," Maris said.

See more about Kaytee Murphy's decision to enroll Kirk Video

Rekers wrote that Kirk would cry out for attention, even throwing tantrums, but Kaytee Murphy was told to keep going.

Harsh beatings

At home, the punishment for feminine behavior would become more severe. The therapists instructed Kirk's parents to use poker chips as a system of rewards and punishments.

According to Rekers' case study, blue chips were given for masculine behavior and would bring rewards, such as candy. But the red chips, given for effeminate behavior, resulted in "physical punishment by spanking from the father."

Mark said he was told to participate in the chip reward-and-punishment system as a way to make Kirk feel like the system was OK.

The family said the spankings were severe. Maris remembers "lots of belt incidents." She escaped the screaming by going to her bed to "lay in the room with my pillow on my head." Later, she would go to Kirk's bedroom and "lay down and hug him and we would just lay there, and the thing that I remember is that he never even showed anger. He was just numb."

During one particularly harsh punishment, their mother recalls, her husband "spanked" Kirk "so hard that he had welts up and down his back and on his buttocks."

She remembers her son Mark saying, "Cry harder, and he won't hit so hard." She says, "Today, it would be abuse."

Sometimes Mark would try to protect his brother, to make his beatings less severe.

"I took some of the red chips and I put them on my side," said Mark, as tears came to his eyes. But he said the beatings were still frequent.

The number of stacked red chips became a telltale sign about the level of tension in the house. When he returned home each day, Mark often looked for the chips in their easily visible location between the living room and the kitchen.

"You looked and were like, 'What's the chip count today? What happened? What changed? How bad is it going to be?' And it was always bad. There was whipping every Friday night. There was no way out of it."

Kirk's formal clinical treatment lasted 10 months, but the family said some of the treatment techniques and practices lasted longer at home.

'Different from everybody else'

Mark Murphy vividly remembers a photo of a smiling young Kirk, age 4, taken a year before the therapy started.

"This is my brother, Kirk Andrew Murphy, right here," Mark said, pointing to the picture. "This is the way he's supposed to be right here," Mark said tearfully.

Mark said the photo shows the last time he remembers his brother as a happy child.

Maris, who was too young to remember Kirk when he went to therapy, said she only knew Kirk after his treatment.

"It left Kirk just totally stricken with the belief that he was broken, that he was different from everybody else," she recalled. "He even ate his lunch in the boy's bathroom for three years of his high school career, if you want to call it that."

CDC: Lack of acceptance can lead to risky behavior for non-straight youth

Kirk's mother said she believes the experimental therapy destroyed Kirk's life.

"I blame them for the way his life turned out," she said. "If one person causes another person's death, I don't care if it's 20 or 50 years later, it's the same as murder in my eyes."

Of course, the actual reason someone commits suicide is difficult, if not impossible to know. The family's allegations that Rekers' therapy caused Kirk Murphy to take his life are just that -- allegations.

When Rekers did not respond to CNN's repeated requests for an interview, CNN producers tracked him down in Florida to ask about the Murphy family's allegations.

"Well, I think, scientifically that would be inaccurate to assume that it was the therapy, but I do grieve for the parents now that you've told me that news. I think that's very sad," he said.

Rekers pointed out that the therapy had been decades earlier.

"That's a long time ago, and to hypothesize, you have a hypothesis that positive treatment back in the 1970s has something to do with something happening decades later. That would, that hypothesis would need a lot of scientific investigation to see if it's valid. Two independent psychologists with me had evaluated him and said he was better adjusted after treatment, so it wasn't my opinion." he said.

One of those psychologists has since died. The other -- Dr. Larry Ferguson -- told CNN that he did evaluate Kirk Murphy as a teenager. He said the family was well adjusted and he did not see any "red flags" when evaluating Kirk. But Maris Murphy says Kirk lied to those examining him. "He was conditioned to say what they wanted to hear," she said.

Rekers said he could not give specific details about Kirk Murphy's treatment, citing doctor-patient confidentiality. For him, the bottom line is that the therapy was intended to help.

"I only meant to help, do the best I could with the parents, and I've written articles you can look up, too, on the rationale for our treatment. And the rationale was positive; to help children, help the parents who come to us in their distress asking questions, 'What can we do to help our child be better adjusted?' " Rekers said.

Watch Rekers respond to news of Murphy's suicide

Karl Bryant, a professor of women's and gender studies at the State University of New York at New Paltz, was also taken to UCLA as a child, as a part of a different study of effeminate boys.

Bryant said he thinks the more tragic part of Kirk's story is people "trying to do something good, trying to help ... even in a misguided mode, who end up producing these negative outcomes for people."

Bryant has studied the history of work done with children with opposite-sex behavior extensively, and said the studies are complex.

"I never have -- had tried to kill myself or thought that I was going to kill myself," said Bryant. "But I could identify with that pain of -- of feeling like you want to be something and other people want you to be something that you aren't."

'Unwanted homosexuality'

Rekers, who conducted the therapy on Kirk, went on to build a career of influence based on the premise from his research that homosexuality can be prevented.

He became a founding member of the Family Research Council, a faith-based organization that lobbies against gay-rights issues. Rekers was also on the board of the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality, an organization of scientists that says its mission is to offer treatment to those who struggle with what they call "unwanted homosexuality."

"He's viewed as an expert by some, you know, when it's -- when it serves their purposes," said Bryant. "So, you know, basically, conservative and what I would call mostly 'fringe' groups have really, you know, Rekers as their poster boy."

Just last year, Rekers' days as an anti-gay champion would come to an end. He hired a male escort to accompany him on his trip to Europe.

Rekers denies any sexual contact with the male escort. Rekers says he's not gay. He claims he wasn't aware that his companion offered sexual favors for sale over the Internet until after the trip, and says he hired him only to carry his bags. But the reporters who brokethe story about Rekers' trip say they saw Rekers pushing a luggage cart through a Miami airport, where they took his photo.

After the scandal broke, Rekers resigned from NARTH. And the Family Research Council said in a statement they hadn't had contact with Rekers in "over a decade."

Reporters find tragic story amid embarrassing scandal

His reputation among those who oppose homosexuality may be tarnished, but his research is still being cited in books and journals.

As recently as 2009, a book Rekers co-authored, "Handbook of Therapy for Unwanted Homosexual Attractions," cites Kraig's case as a success. That was six years after Kirk Murphy took his own life.

For Maris Murphy, there is more to the story than what was written in case studies about her brother.

"The research has a postscript that needs to be added," she said. "That is that Kirk Andrew Murphy was Kraig and he was gay, and he committed suicide."

"I want people to remember that this was a little boy who deserved protection, respect and unconditional love," his sister said. "I don't want him to be remembered as a science experiment. He was a person." -CNN U.S.

Editor's note: "AC360º" examined a shocking "experimental therapy" designed to make feminine boys more masculine. The result was a special report, "The Sissy Boy Experiment." 

Think It Over Fellow Christian

Well, I can't say my ex-gay experience or therapy was as severe as the young man in this story, but it is rooted in the same thing: you have something that is unwanted.

Unwanted by God.

Unwanted by Society.

Unwanted by Businesses.

And so you come to believe that you too don't want this.  I professed in Church, in therapy, signed agreements for specialized retreats to agree that it was I who didn't want this and time and time again tried different methods to heal and incorporate more "masculinity" in my life to diminish "unwanted same sex" attractions. So maybe you are like me, you've cried till you couldn't physically cry anymore, you've prayed, visualized, done hair raising psycho drama beating pillows, hugging your dead father etc. etc.  Not all that bad, but you wrestle with the same thing....you have something called "unwanted".  Except for you, its like climbing Mt. Everest to even near rid yourself of.  People in your church can gossip, get divorced, and recover. But not you...because your thing is more twisted then rest. They say it is sin like any other sin but yet treat you differently if you begin to talk about it.

I know what you are thinking.  Its in the Bible, you feel the presence of God in your life and your convinced homosexuality is a sin.  You probably have people right around you that say "hate the sin, love the sinner".

If that's enough for you, then I would ask, how's that working for you?  I imagine you are reading this because you are struggling for perhaps several years, you have doubts.  I'm going to tell you what helped me and I'm still a Christian today.

I proposed early on my Christian walk and ex-gay walk that I would examine all sides of different faiths and different arguments.  This is because I saw everyone outside of my faith as being brainwashed by the culture and "false" religion they grew up in.  I believed mine to be real and that it  should stand up to any scrutiny.  I read lots of books, talked to people of different cultures, religions, gay, bi, ex-gay, ex-ex-gay.  It took a long time and had to do it at my own pace.  It changed my life and deepened my relationship with God.

DO YOUR RESEARCH ON YOUR TERMS. And take the risk to listen rather then argue with people who believe a little differently.  God judges the heart and soul not theological doctrine.

You need to go on that kind of journey.  What I found is all of us have been brainwashed by our own religions and cultures to some degree.  We live in a society with religions resistance to any change that is centered around progress and knowledge.  They use the excuse "God does not change!" to retain old, proven false beliefs when God does change how and what God does. It is God's character that is said not to change.  You cannot contain God in one man just as you cannot contain any God into one book, The Bible, that is being interpretated against you.  Oh! And conveniently minus the historical, cultural and language aspects of the period. This is equivalent to someone in year 3020 interpreting our meaning for the word "lady killer" as a actual killer of ladies.

If you believe God can still speak today, then you need to know those who do not throw out historical, cultural, and language aspects of the Bible do not agree that homosexuality is a sin.

Now, I can sincerely say, if you continue to buy into this, you will continue to notice other ex-gays disappear and accept themselves as gay or simply go a bit nuts. You will continue to feel a deep fracture in yourself you can't quite describe, you will continue to feel lower then others around you, you will continue to divert to dangerous, risky sexual behavior when you just can't take it any more.  You will continue to suppress how hypocritical your Church may be toward homosexuals. You'll continue to entertain on occasion if you shouldn't just kill yourself.  You'll struggle with the belief that you will never find love or love again. You'll wonder privately if you are going to hell.  You may struggle to hold a job, relationships or control your anger or depression.

This isn't a cross that God or the Bible has asked you to bear.  Its a cross that others fearful of their own sexuality, prideful in their own self--righteousness have said you must bare in order to be loved, to accept yourself and to heal.  Meanwhile, its been years and your still dying inside.  So how is this form of "healing" going for you?

And what about the leaders in the movement? I don't know about you but I wouldn't trust them with my heart after I got to know them.  So if they are that messed up themselves, why are you trusting them with a highly questionable form of therapy that is more known for the damage it does then the good?  I'm not saying it is all bad, or all of them are messed up but rather when it comes down to it...you found yourself fighting for their approval, hem locked out of their clicks and used to make themselves feel they have performed a miracle on you... when in reality you've been more a pawn in a dangerous game.

Realize...they don't know what they are doing.  They want to believe they do!  Most of the successful ones are bi-sexual themselves you will discover and fearful, even mocking of homosexuality. But don't take my word for it. DO YOUR RESEARCH.  Start asking them questions. Play devil's advocate even and note the response you get.

I can tell you after being a participant in Exodus, JIM, PCC and the like for nearly 10+ years that the only ungodly thing is how they are using YOUR sincere wounds to convince you that you have something "unwanted" or bad.  That your life journey has made you into something hell bound and you must fight against it.

Take the journey.  Learn not just who you are, but who these leaders are, what others say, and then you'll see...You will see who you were formed to be--and you will love yourself and others more and find the freedom you have been looking for.

Don't take my word for it. Even, if you must, do it to prove me wrong, but think it over and see what is out there beyond what you've just been told.

God bless –CNN iReport

The Debate Over Sexual Confusion Continues

It is obvious to me now (age 50) that the world is still very confused about many aspects of human sexuality... Unfortunately as a kid, a teenager, as well as a young man; i was extremely naive and sensitive, so i struggled in that arena without a knowledgeable coach... As a result, my sexual identity became very confused...

When i was about 13, my parents sent me to pastoral counseling to straighten me out... Ironically the pastor they sent me to was having an affair, then he got a divorce and when all the news got out, he was disfellowshipped from our church! At age 20, i told my mother that i was gay... first she screamed at me and said i would go to hell if i continued in that deviant way; then she softened a bit and said that many boys go through a similar stage and that i would probably outgrow it... A few months later, i tried to commit suicide... The suicide rate then among gay teens was about three times higher than among 'straight' teens...

I struggled with my sexuality for years after that... i tried celibacy, i tried gay helplines, counseling, anti-gay counseling... i was even sent by my anti-gay counselor to an urologist who prescribed testosterone injections to increase my sex drive toward women... (instead it increased my appetite for homosexual activities)... i also tried a number of spiritual paths including gay friendly ones... Despite my sexual confusion or perhaps because of my motivation to understand it, i grew spiritually, emotionally and intellectually but like many others facing similar confusion, there was a heavy price to pay... i had to deal with substance abuse, sexually transmitted diseases, social pressures, loneliness and a string of failed "relationships"... Unfortunately many of those things seem to be higher in gay circles as well... Something really important seemed to be missing even when i was in a loving relationship...

Fortunately society shifted enough that some people could talk openly about homosexuality and anyone interested could hear it discussed on talk shows... Eventually most of my family members accepted me as 'gay'... Surprisingly the more i accepted myself, the more i realized that i wanted to be married and to have children... Today i have a female wife and two young sons (SMILES)... Marriage is work for most couples, straight, gay or those in between...

Honestly, it is challenging for me at times as well... I still face temptations to be with a man from time to time; but i also realize that i need male friendship much more than i want gay sex... i need to support and protect my family and i realize that there are reasonable borders and values to consider in so doing... Even though our societies have some misplaced laws and expectations, the intention to protect us from potential harm or confusion is useful... i appreciate that the discussion continues... And I believe we are learning how to be more compassionate, more efficient and more aware of the beautiful diversity around us... My hope is that each of us will seek more wisdom regarding human sexuality and that we become more considerate of our own needs as well as the needs of those around us... It seems that we are progressing beyond some of the orthodox values passed down to us and that now we are developing a new understanding and appreciation for our true spiritual sensibilities as well as our God given sensualities. –CNN iReport

On Being Gay

I grew up in a very gay friendly household.  When I was 11 my uncle died of AIDS and I learned what being gay actually meant.

When I was 14 years old my mom came to me and asked if I was a homosexual.  She asked because she had noticed me having a lot of female friends and not taking an interest in a lot of things that "guys" take interest in.

I wasn't gay then and I am not gay now, but I get asked by girls I go out with if I am.  On a number of occasions I've been on a date with a girl and they are convinced that I must be gay.

Part of it has to do with my love of show-tunes, some of it has to do with the fact that I am in touch with my emotions, and I'm sure people question why I don't care too much about sports or cars or anything that "guys" enjoy.

The truth of the matter is I was just born attracted to women.  I don't think this is unfortunate, but I never really had a choice in the matter.  We all have choices about the things we do, but we don't have choices about the things that interest us.

I think that part of the problem in our country is that there is the notion, in some circles, that being gay is trendy or chic.  In my early 20's girls would make out with each other at bars, saying they were bi-sexual, in order to attract attention from the men.

Once in college I had a friend that attended a freshman mixer with me.  We were out to try our luck with the opposite sex.  Neither of us really had the skills or confidence we needed to pick up women, but it was a fond memory.  6 months later I saw the same kid walking down the hall holding hands with a girl.  When I asked if it was his girlfriend he said "oh, gosh no...I'm gay".

We talked about his coming out and this was his experience.  He went to a support meeting for homosexual and gay friendly people.  When he was there someone had asked him if he'd had a girlfriend.  When he realized that he hadn't for a while and that going out with women hadn't come easy to him, he decided he would try being gay.  It was easier for him.  I think that people who act this way damage the gay community by allowing people to think that being gay is a conscious decision.

To this day I don't know if he was actually gay or not.  What I do know is that not many people actually willingly want to enter into the gay lifestyle.  There is hatred and bigotry everywhere, even in this day and age.  The reason that coming out is so hard is because people are not accepting of the gay community.

People are gay because they are born gay.  They can no more choose their sexual preference than I can choose the types of women I am attracted to. –CNN iReport

Jun 12, 2011

This Weeks Sound Off

The Origins of the Pre-Tribulation Rapture

^^^*^^^

I have NEVER nor will I EVER believe in the Christian’s theory that prior to Christ’s return they (Christian’s) will be miraculously removed from the earth in order to avoid going through the tribulation.

This none-biblical theory is exactly that … a man made theory that is and never will come about. Those who follow this teaching lives in spiritual dilution. And this “theory” is no different than the end time predictions made by delusional men who really are nothing more than Satan’s agents to deceive their followers.

According to the Scriptures ALL of mankind will be tried and will have to choose whom they will serve … Christ or Satan. This will be mankind’s final test which will decide your loyalty, as well as their destination … eternal bliss or eternal separation.

The Rapture is a man made lie and to believe it’s theory is setting yourself up for disappointment.

Ragbag Headliners

Why Brazil's Response To AIDS Worked

As we mark the 30th anniversary of the CDC's official reporting of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, it's surprising to see which nation has fared the best in response. It's not the United States; it's not China, India, or even Russia ... It's our good friend to the south, Brazil.

I first began to learn about Brazil's success as a doctoral student investigating the impact of AIDS on politics and society in the developing world. Surprised by Brazil's early response to the epidemic, especially when compared to other nations, I tossed my laptop into a backpack and set out for Brazil.

After several trips to cities throughout the country, interviewing AIDS patients, health officials, and activists, it gradually became clear that the government was indeed fully committed to eradicating AIDS, in turn proving to the world that it had the technical capacity and political commitment needed to do so.

As evidence of Brazil's success, consider the following. Aggressive national prevention campaigns for high-risk groups have contributed to a sharp decline of HIV/AIDS cases in Brazil. Because of the creation of national prevention programs targeting gay men and women, in 2002 and 2007, respectively, Brazil has seen a dramatic decline in HIV/AIDS cases among gay men, from 3,376 in 1996 to 647 in 2009, and among women, from 7,419 in 1996 to 2,034 in 2009.

In contrast, infection among the highest at-risk groups in the United States, currently African Americans and gay men, remains elevated: in 1998, 20,672 new cases were reported among African Americans, increasing to 21,549 in 2009, while 17,357 cases were reported for gay men in 1998, falling only to 14,383 in 2009.

Considering the fact that Brazil was a military dictatorship with a highly unequal distribution of health care coverage less then 20 years ago, how did it pull this off?

Start by following the money trail. Brazil's allocation of congressional funding, while lower than in the United States, has risen steadily. From 2000 to 2007, the Brazilian congress nearly doubled the amount committed to fighting AIDS -- from 713,000 Brazilian reais to 1.3 billion in 2007. (A real is worth approximately 63 cents.) U.S. spending has risen at a slower rate.

Brazil has also done a better job at providing AIDS medication. In 1996, the Congress passed a federal law mandating the universal provision of antiretroviral (ARV) medication. National spending for ARV medications has burgeoned from 25 million reais in 1996 to more than a billion reais by 2009.

In contrast, the United States has consistently fallen short of guaranteeing access to medicine. According to a report released by NASTAD (National Alliance of State & Territorial AIDS Directors) last month, there is a waiting list of 8,100 individuals in need of ARV medication.

Realizing that cities were in need of funding to help fight the disease, Brazil's national AIDS bureaucracy also created new programs to provide support. In 2002, the national bureaucracy created the Fundo-a-Fundo Incentivos program, which provides monthly grant allocations to cities demonstrating need. Funding for this program has increased from 579,000 reais in 2003 to 1.5 billion reais in 2010. In the United States, by contrast, the Congress and CDC have not created new fiscal programs assisting cities; the last time the United States created one was in 1993 - Ryan White/CARE.

Brazil's national AIDS officials learned early on that they needed to work closely with civil society in order to successfully combat AIDS. Beginning in the mid-1980s, the government invited gay activists and nongovernmental organization representatives into the national AIDS bureaucracy to help devise policies and learn more about the virus and about health care needs.

Activists clamoring for universal access to medicine under the military during the early 1980s were also incorporated into the AIDS program, in turn leading to the rise of bureaucrats who were unwaveringly committed to the free distribution of ARV medication. While the CDC also reached out to AIDS activists during the 1980s, it never went as far as to officially incorporate them into the agency.

But Brazil's unique political situation also helped. In 1985, Brazil transitioned from a repressive military dictatorship to a vibrant democracy. Access to health care as a human right was penned into the 1988 constitution.

Consequently, when AIDS emerged, the government was essentially forced to do whatever it could to guarantee access to medicine and health care. When short on cash, these commitments forced the national AIDS bureaucracy to engage in intensive bargaining negotiations with pharmaceutical companies to lower prices for drugs.

If they failed to reach agreement, the pharmaceutical companies faced the specter that Brazil would produce and distribute generic versions of their patented medicines.

Ongoing praise for Brazil's success has further strengthened the government's commitment to AIDS. As a result of winning the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation award for the best model response in 2003, echoed by UNAIDS in 2004 and receiving praise by CNN's Dr. Sanjay Gupta as the "envy of the world" in 2009, the government has been incentivized to increase its commitment to the epidemic.

Why Brazil's AIDS response is "envy of the world" Video

But this has also motivated the government to help African nations develop the capacity needed to produce ARV medications while using the international community's praise as a platform to address other related issues, such as poverty alleviation, human rights, and even biofuel technology.

(The United States has contributed its share to Africa. In May 2003, Congress provided $15 billion over five years for President Bush's plan to fund the distribution of ARV medication in Africa and the Caribbean, the largest bilateral contribution to AIDS in the world. The program was re-authorized for another five years in 2008.)

Though unique in its history, culture and scenic beauty, Brazil nevertheless provides a lesson just as big as the country itself: Fully protecting your people from HIV/AIDS not only advances their health and progress, but it can also advance your government's image and influence as an emerging global power. –CNN Opinion

Editor's note: Eduardo J. Gómez is an assistant professor in the Department of Public Policy & Administration at Rutgers University at Camden. The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Eduardo J. Gómez.

<><><>*<><><>

HIV in the '80s: 'People Didn't Want To Kiss You On The Cheek'

On June 5, 1981, the virus that would become known as HIV was mentioned for the first time in a medical publication. As we approach that anniversary, CNNHealth takes a look at 30 years of the epidemic that changed the world, through the eyes of people who've lived it.

In 1985, Edmund White had five or six published books behind him, a Swiss lover with him and the outcome of an HIV test ahead of him. When the results came in, White told his partner:

"I'm a good enough novelist to know how this is going to work out. I'm going to be positive, you're going to be negative, you're going to be very nice about it, but you're going to break up with me within a year."

By many accounts, White is a good novelist -- a great one, actually, having written numerous acclaimed works of fiction and nonfiction.

Unfortunately, his storytelling sensibility foretold how the HIV tests would turn out and how he would lose his lover because of the dire prognosis: only two or three years left to live.

Like so many gay men in the 1980s, White struggled with an illness that seemed like a death sentence and isolated him from those who feared contagion. But he didn't let himself be defined by his illness, nor did he try to hide it.

Through his activism, writing and public appearances, White gave a voice to so many of his peers who were afraid to announce their status and a memory for the hundred-some friends he has lost to AIDS over the past 30 years.

The price of free love

For many, HIV marked the end of what has been called the "Golden Age of Promiscuity." After the Stonewall riots of 1969, when gays fought back against a police raid at a bar in New York's Greenwich Village, gay activism exploded across the country, and social life became more open. And with birth control pills available, abortion legalized and antibiotics developed for many sexually transmitted diseases, the risks of all forms of sex seemed more minimal than ever before.

If you've read White's books, you know he's not shy about how much sex he had with a gamut of men in those days.

"New York seemed either frightening or risible to the rest of the nation. To us, however, it represented the only free port on the entire continent. Only in New York could we walk hand in hand with a member of the same sex," White wrote of the 1970s in his memoir "City Boy: My Life in New York During the 1960s and 70s."

That relative bliss came under attack in 1981, when writer Larry Kramer invited White and dozens of other gay men to his apartment near Washington Square Park. Dr. Alvin Friedman-Kien, a dermatologist and virologist at NYU's Langone Medical Center, spoke to them about a mysterious illness that seemed to target gays.

Friedman-Kien had been finding Kaposi's sarcoma, a tumor normally seen only in older men of Eastern European or Mediterranean origin, in young gay men. Cases of that "gay cancer" were also cropping up in San Francisco.

"People asked me what they should do, and I said, 'well, really, we think there might be something about gay sexual activity related to the tumor and the other diseases that are occurring.' And the group was kind of outraged," Friedman-Kien remembers. "They weren't about to give up free sex and their open new lifestyle."

"Everybody looked at everybody like, is this guy crazy?" White recalls.

Meanwhile, in Los Angeles, Dr. Michael Gottlieb had started seeing clusters of pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) among gays, leading to a June 5, 1981, report from the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention that's considered the first scientific publication regarding HIV.

In July, the CDC published a followup about the Kaposi's sarcoma cases that Friedman-Kien and other doctors had observed. Both the pneumonia and cancer symptoms indicated that a never-before-seen infectious disease was destroying the immune systems of many gay men.

A new "crisis"

As more people in their community came down with this illness, White, Kramer and four other men formed the Gay Men's Health Crisis. The name emphasized the target population of gay men and the seemingly temporary nature of the disease. White became the first president.

The organization, which met in people's living rooms, had ambitious goals that were hard to achieve in the early '80s. The men wanted to urge prevention, but no one knew exactly what was causing the disease or how to control it; they wanted to back research but didn't have enough funds; they wanted to sustain people who had the disease, even though there weren't effective treatments at the time. Also, they believed that society at large didn't care.

But the group was in the dark about how to best help the cause. "We were so benighted and so cut off from the mainstream and so low in self-esteem that all we could think to do was to have a disco party," he said.

Unfortunately, these parties didn't generate enough money to finance research or spread information, and researchers had trouble getting enough funding. Friedman-Kien and colleagues had to rely on handouts and private foundations for research money because they couldn't get the attention of the government, including the New York Public Health System.

"The attitude was, these (diseases) are only in gays and IV drug users, underdogs, people who didn't deserve any special attention," Friedman-Kien said. "It wasn't until the hemophiliacs developed PCP pneumonia and other opportunistic infections that the government suddenly felt they were victims."

Compared with other illnesses, though, the trajectory of HIV research and treatment development moved faster than almost anything else in medicine, said Dr. John Bartlett, professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, who has led the school's efforts to combat and prevent AIDS since the early '80s.

"The people that had it had the feeling that their needs were being ignored. I think that plays out with any really lethal disease. You just don't think scientists or medicine is doing enough. Some of it is not necessarily reality," Bartlett said.

After a few months, White was happy to hand over leadership of Gay Men's Health Crisis to Paul Popham, whom White remembers as a successful businessman. But Popham and Kramer fought, leading to Kramer's departure from the group. Kramer later wrote the play "The Normal Heart" about those early days of Gay Men's Health Crisis, now recognized as the world's first provider of HIV/AIDS prevention. Kramer went on to found ACT UP, an activist group instrumental in demanding better health care and research for HIV. Popham died in 1987, of AIDS.

No refuge in Europe

When White moved to France in 1983 through a prestigious Guggenheim Fellowship for writing, he thought he was escaping this new disease, at least for a while. He liked Paris so much that he stayed there -- "with its drizzle, as cool, grey and luxurious as chinchilla," he writes in the autobiographical novel "The Farewell Symphony" -- beyond the year that he had planned.

But HIV began hitting the country in a big way. One of its early victims was French philosopher Michel Foucault, also gay, who invited White over for dinner a few times for rich meals without vegetables. When White brought up AIDS, Foucault laughed and accused him of being puritanical, calling it an "invented" disease "aimed just at gays to punish them for having unnatural sex." The esteemed thinker died of the disease in the summer of 1984.

"In Paris AIDS was dismissed as an American phobia until French people started dying; then everyone said, 'Well, you have to die some way or another.' If Americans were hysterical and pragmatic, the French were fatalistic, depressed but determined to keep the party going," White writes in "The Farewell Symphony."

Since he'd had so many sexual encounters with different men, White had generally assumed that he was HIV-positive. But the reality of blood test results hit him hard: His own life party seemed to have stopped.

He was too dejected to write and had no support system to help him through that tough time. None of the American-style support groups existed in Paris. He had joined a group called AIDES, founded by Foucault's surviving partner, but the focus was more on political campaigning than on personal experiences with the illness.

"People didn't talk about things like that. If somebody became ill in Paris, they would go back to their village and die behind closed shutters," he said.

AIDS gave its victims what Bartlett calls "the three D's" that no one wants to have: dementia, diarrhea and disgrace.

"It was an awful way to live. They got emaciated. They died a lingering death," Bartlett said. "If you asked me, 'How would you least want to die?' I'd say, 'The way an AIDS patient died in 1990.' "

And back when people thought HIV could be transmitted through saliva or tears, they would limit their casual contact, White said. Bartlett remembers the same fears; people even wondered whether mosquitoes could transmit the virus.

"Mothers didn't want me picking up their babies. People didn't want to kiss you on the cheek. People certainly didn't want to have sex with you, especially other gay people. It was very isolating and demeaning," White said. "That was a long battle."

But within a year or two, educated people got the word that HIV doesn't spread through non-sexual gestures. The death of actor Rock Hudson in October 1985 played a big part in that, White remembers; there was so much publicity around Hudson's death that it had the effect of bringing AIDS out of the closet.

And back in the U.S., President Reagan also took the issue seriously. Surgeon General C. Everett Koop wrote a brochure about AIDS that was sent to all 107 million American households in 1988. Bartlett also gives a lot of credit to basketball star Magic Johnson for revealing his HIV-positive status in 1991, destigmatizing it broadly.

Still, it was harder to get a date (and still is). White said that once he reveals his status, he'll often be rejected instantly "unless people are very educated and scientific in their orientation."

Enlightenment

White isn't a religious or "New Age-y" person and considers himself an atheist. But about a year after the diagnosis, he had a moment of reflection that kept him moving forward.

He sat in his Paris apartment cross-legged on his little couch-bed, in a yoga position he barely knew how to do, and meditated. It was a way of coping with his positive status, since statistically it seemed inevitable that he would die soon.

"I asked my body if it was going to die or not from AIDS. And it said no," he said. "I sort of paid attention to that."

Superficially, he considers it a "totally superstitious, ridiculous moment."

But he listened to it, even when the reporters started showing up in Paris to interview him as a great writer who would be dead within a year. PBS's Peter Jennings and the BBC's "Face to Face" featured him in 1990.

White spoke to reporters about being HIV-positive when virtually no other prominent people were open about it. At that time, the only people seen talking about AIDS in the press were doctors, he said.

"I took it as being something like the original struggle to come out as a gay person. And I said, 'OK, well, now we have to come out as being positive.' But nobody else was that imprudent, because they really felt that it would lead to discrimination," he said.

Among his works from that period, he co-wrote a book of short stories with Adam Mars-Jones called "The Darker Proof," published in 1988, which was the first creative statement by gays about what living with the disease was like for ordinary people. The short story "Palace Days" fictionalizes the moment when he told his Swiss lover how he thought he'd be positive and his partner would be negative.

White devoted himself to researching the life of gay novelist Jean Genet, a project that took seven years before the highly acclaimed 1993 biography appeared. And in 1997, he published "The Farewell Symphony," the third of his autobiographical novels. Having recently lost his lover to AIDS, the narrator looks back on his sex-filled experiences in New York and Paris but confronts the disease head-on only in the last chapter, when he finds out his own status and loses many good friends to the illness.

"And now, as I numbered my dead, I felt that I'd spent my whole life social climbing and someone had sawed the ladder out from under me," he writes in "The Farewell Symphony."

The medication question

White didn't take any drugs in the early days. He was raised a Christian Scientist, and even though he didn't subscribe to that religion, he still kept the old habits of avoiding doctors for the most part.

In 1986, the year after White's diagnosis, AZT got approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, marking a breakthrough for AIDS treatment. Pharmaceutical companies had shied away from drug development because they thought it was impossible to treat a retrovirus, a disease like HIV that's incorporated into the genome of the infected person. Importantly, AZT quickly brought down the rate of babies infected with HIV, Bartlett said.

But everyone White knew who took AZT in the '80s seemed to die faster than those who didn't take it.

"We just knew that it worked, but we knew it didn't last long," Bartlett said. It seems, retrospectively, that AZT lengthened life by about four to six months at that time.

Since his T-cell counts were still relatively high, White didn't try AZT. The drug had to be taken every four hours, even during the night, and came with nausea, diarrhea, vomiting and other side effects.

"It made people sick, sick as a dog, because we gave huge doses," Bartlett said.

A more robust therapy came in 1996 with the "triple cocktail" of three kinds of drugs that help the body fight HIV and boost the immune system's defenses. That marked a game-changer, with the ability to lower people's virus load to undetectable levels. Still, the regimen was demanding at first: People needed to take their medications several times a day and had bad side effects, Bartlett said.

Since then, the drugs have gotten a lot easier to manage. There's even treatment that's a single pill, combining the three kinds of drugs, that can be taken once a day, and more like that are in the pipeline, Bartlett said. And with available treatments, many people are living with HIV as a chronic illness instead of dying and don't have specific symptoms. Patients on appropriate meds may have "near-normal" longevity, Bartlett said, though more research is needed to determine the illness' exact effect.

"The medicine that we have today restores health," Bartlett said. "It's a whole lot different than it used to be, and they look terrific."

No longer a death sentence

White eventually learned that he's in a small category of people with HIV called slow progressors, people whose disease does not develop as rapidly as in most patients. Since 2004, he has been on a simplified triple-therapy regimen.

Now 71 years old, White has been a beloved professor of creative writing at Princeton University since 1999, a position in which his knowledge, charisma and passion for prose often transform students' thinking about storytelling.

Gay Men's Health Crisis has also transformed from the small gathering of White and five other men in 1981; it now has 200 staffers, 900 volunteers and a corporate structure. The organization offers many services such as rapid testing, support groups and a hot line, and it advocates for more government funds for HIV/AIDS.

"We certainly stand on the shoulders on those six very brave and courageous men who challenged the larger society, challenged the gay community, challenged government to really take account of what was happening, even before it was officially named and even before people understood it," said Marjorie Hill, the current CEO of Gay Men's Health Crisis. "They said, 'We need to take care of each other.' "

As the endurance of that group suggests, the crisis is not over. The most recent data from the CDC suggest that there were about 56,000 new HIV infections in 2006, and 15,600 AIDS-related deaths per year, in the United States alone. And although fewer people are dying than in the 1980s, there's still a lot of work to be done, particularly with regard to prevention and education, Hill said.

"The continued service as well as advocacy we do is really a continuation and in honor of the courageous move that they made, what's for some people a lifetime ago," she said.

White writes, on average, a book every year. Teaching and writing take up most of his time. He has lived with his partner Michael Carroll, with whom he has an open relationship, since 1995.

"Now, I think there's every reason to be hopeful. It really is more like a disease like diabetes," White said. "There are a lot of inconveniences, but you can go on living. And I would say AIDS is about like that now." -CNN Health

<><><>*<><><>

AIDS In The '90s: 'I Wasn't Going To Die Miserably'

She sat in a small exam room, down a hallway that gets even longer when she remembers it. That was where doctors told Linda Scruggs, 13 weeks pregnant, that she had tested positive for HIV.

"They told me that I had the option of terminating the pregnancy to prolong my health, and they offered me, with the termination, five years to live," recalls Scruggs. "If I did not terminate this baby, probably me and the baby both would be dead within three years."

That year, 1990, marked Scruggs' 25th birthday and her status as one of an estimated 1 million people in the United States infected with HIV.

"I was pregnant. I was making real crazy decisions. I think my hormones were probably crazy."

And she faced the cruelest of choices: Should she bring a baby into the world who might die in childhood? Or have an abortion, to prolong her own life?

That year, more than 31,000 American lives were lost to AIDS, according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports from that time. Most were 25 to 44 years old, with blacks and Hispanics having the highest death rates.

HIV in the '80s: 'People didn't want to kiss you on the cheek'

Two decades later, Scruggs sits in an office above a busy street in Washington, coordinating programs to spread awareness of AIDS and fight the stigma that lingers. She's 46, tall and full of energy; a space between her front teeth adds to her youthful smile.

A sign on the wall reads "God answers knee mail." Thick white binders on her bookshelf are remnants of the National Train-the-Trainer initiative, which gave more than 200 men and women with HIV the skills to become educators in their own communities. Scruggs wipes a tear as she describes it; the program just lost its funding.

How Scruggs went from a bewildered young woman with a deadly prognosis to a passionate leader in the HIV advocacy world is a story of courage, dedication and faith. She persevered not only with her own illness, but in helping countless others live their lives in the face of impending death.

On her office wall is evidence of another choice she made: a photograph of her son, Isaiah, who is now 20.

Coping with diagnosis

Two years before her diagnosis, Scruggs had tackled her own drug addiction. She didn't enter a formal program but willed herself to quit snorting cocaine, smoking marijuana and drinking.

People in the drug world called her an "alley cat." She didn't come from an impoverished background. She was the daughter of a retired military officer, from a fairly well-to-do middle class African-American family -- but still she ended up in a lifestyle of addiction.

"I found myself constantly around and with people who were not good for me," she said. "Life had been really, really hard."

She'd also had unprotected sex with several men, sometimes against her will, who probably had multiple partners themselves. She has no idea exactly when she got HIV.

More on AIDS

"I don't know where it happened or who that person was," she said. "Unfortunately I've been raped twice before my diagnosis. I'm kind of imagining that it wasn't even one of those, because that would be sad and depressing. But I'm just really imagining it was one of those times I was high on the ecstasies of life."

All of that was in the past when she moved to Baltimore, Maryland, to be with the father of her child, and to start a new life there. But the day before Thanksgiving of 1990, she got the news that made her want to give up.

"It's hard to describe the desperation of just really having no self-worth, no self-value. Life just wasn't loving me."

Instead of going home to her boyfriend after the clinic, Scruggs joined the pre-Thanksgiving traffic and drove to the Delaware Memorial Bridge. She felt tired, tired of living through all the bad things that had happened to her that she'd kept secret. She got out of the car and stood by the edge as cars honked their horns behind her. And then, a voice from within seemed to speak.

"I believe that was a moment that God spoke to me," she remembers.

"'Where is your faith?'" the voice said. '''I'll take care of this.' "

At home, she told her boyfriend about her diagnosis. He held her, cried with her, and told her everything would be OK. "Just don't tell anybody. We'll figure it out."

Scruggs didn't want to resume their physical relationship, but after a break from sex the couple started using condoms. They got married, and her husband promised to love her as long as she never talked about being HIV-positive.

"I was still hurting and crying on the inside," she said.

After their son Isaiah was born, post-partum depression set in. Scruggs agonized over whether he had HIV too, and her husband refused to get tested himself. Finally, when Isaiah was 18 months old, Scruggs found out the good news: Her son was negative.

Doctors may not have known it at the time, but that wasn't too unusual. Dr. John Bartlett, professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, says only about 15% of babies were actually getting HIV from their mothers. Transmission happened during passage through the birth canal.

Although her son was safe, Scruggs needed support for her own condition, and felt like she needed to be able to talk about her disease. But her husband wouldn't allow it.

"He said I couldn't be married to him any longer. I packed up my bags, I took my little boy and I started a new life."

She learned more about HIV through the American Red Cross, and ended up getting certified in HIV education. She started working at Johns Hopkins University's peer program, and became a women's health advocate there.

"Suddenly, I couldn't stop talking about it. Absolutely I knew that if I was going to die, I wasn't going to die miserably."

In the underworld

Scruggs devoted herself to helping others better understand the disease.

She started several support groups, and worked with a nurse practitioner at Johns Hopkins to go to schools and talk to nurses and principals about HIV.

At that time, some mothers of HIV-positive children thought they couldn't go to school.

"They weren't going to live forever, but for a 6-year-old to tell you all she really wanted to do was go to school, a 7-year-old to say I've never been to school and I just want to go to school and Mom won't let me go ... there was no reason for (that)," she said.

Crack cocaine was a huge problem, and a norm, among Scruggs' clients in Baltimore. Multiple generations in a given family might be HIV-positive, drug-addicted and welfare dependent. Scruggs became a certified substance abuse counselor so that she could better help these people.

Once, Scruggs went looking for one woman she'd been helping who had been in recovery, but had relapsed. Asking around, she found out that the woman had been seen at a "shooting gallery," where addicts go to inject themselves with recreational drugs.

"It almost felt like the den of death, what hell would have felt like to me. There were people laying around, with needles in their arms shooting dope. There was a gentleman in the corner, I'll never forget, he was laying on the floor and somebody was shooting dope in his neck and it was bleeding," she said.

Scruggs called out her client's name. She wasn't there. But Scruggs' journey to the underworld gave her new insight.

"What I came out of that space with, though, is that part of what's wrong with these women that I'm trying reach is: They don't have vision."

"I remember saying, 'Wow, God, that's why I'm here. That's why you pulled out this little middle-class suburban girl: To teach these ladies that there's some vision.'"

Speaking out

A turning point in Scruggs' mission to reduce HIV stigma came in 1993 when a speaker canceled at a conference for physicians and Scruggs was asked to fill in. Until then, she had only spoken to individuals and small groups about HIV, and had not revealed her own HIV status. But the conference would pay $500, and Scruggs' rent was due. So she went home and put on a suit.

When she entered the hotel conference room and saw 700 people waiting for her to speak, the money didn't seem worth it. But Scruggs pushed her fears aside and started talking. As she shared what she'd been through, she felt unexpected release.

"When I got up there and I began to talk and I began to tell my story, I literally could hear the key turning in the lock," she said. "I'm crying, they're crying, but at the same time I wasn't crying 'cause I was sad. This was like, wow, I just unlocked a part of me that I didn't know I had a shackle on it."

Ever since, she has relished opportunities to talk about what happened to her and about the importance of HIV education. She wants others to know that ecstatic feeling of freedom that comes with being open about trauma.

"This is me learning, wow, if I just tell it, it doesn't have to hurt. If I tell it, I don't have to hold my head down. If I tell it, I take ownership."

Still, Scruggs was weighed down by the fear that her son would be left alone. She wrote letters and made audiotapes containing the messages she wanted him to have in the future. She took him on vacations twice a year, so he'd have memories and pictures to last the rest of his life.

"I would just pray to God, let me just live until he was 10. If I could live until he was 10, I would have taught him enough lessons, I would have hugged him enough, I would have kissed him enough," she said.

But miraculously, Scruggs never had actual symptoms of HIV beyond fatigue, which could have been associated with something else. She feels especially lucky because for 14 years, she never took medication for the disease.

At first, no drugs for Scruggs

Dr. Angelike Liappis knows many women with serious illnesses who take care of everyone else before they get help themselves. Scruggs, who came to see her in the early 2000s when Liappis worked at George Washington University, seemed to be no exception.

The physician and her former patient both recall their relationship as a "partnership." Scruggs had made the decision to seek a new doctor and explore treatment options, and Liappis wanted to help with that process.

Scruggs had dismissed the idea of taking HIV medications during the first decade after diagnosis because she didn't want to depend on dozens of pills every day, and feared drug resistance if she used them improperly. The first medication, AZT, had to be taken every four hours, including throughout the night, and only extended life about four to six months. "Triple cocktail" drugs in 1996 were a breakthrough for combatting the virus, but were still hard to take in terms of daily quantity and side effects, Bartlett said. To this day, HIV patients must be on medication for life, so it's crucial to have a daily regimen that's easy and as painless as possible.

By 2004, treatments were available that had fewer side effects and an easier-to-manage daily schedule than ever before. Liappis reviewed all the possibilities with Scruggs, and together they forged a plan that involved three or four pills a day.

"Starting the treatment was the way that she took care of herself," said Liappis, who is now at the Washington VA Hospital but did not treat Scruggs there.

Scruggs tolerated the drugs well; her system responded, and they helped her eventually get to undetectable levels of the virus, Scruggs said.

Liappis also saw Scruggs' passion and strength outside the examination room. Together, they ran a women's support group in which Scruggs spoke candidly about her personal experiences.

"She really is able to communicate at a basic level with everyone and really connect with them. She's very inspiring in that way," Liappis said.

"She's probably one of the most courageous women I've ever met."

Toward a better future

For a long time, Scruggs didn't want a romantic relationship with anyone who was HIV-positive because she didn't want to fall in love with a man, take care of him and then lose him to the disease. And she was generally open about her status, revealing it on the first or second date.

So when she met Nathaniel eight years ago, she wasn't interested in dating. But one of Scruggs' friends introduced them in an e-mail, and the two met in person at a pharmaceutical company meeting. Nathaniel was HIV-positive, had two kids of his own, and also came from a background of strong faith. He prodded her to consider treatment, which she had avoided to that point.

The two married in 2005. HIV isn't a secret in their life, and it doesn't come between them.

"He'll say 'Did you take your medicine?' in the morning. In the evening, I'll say "Did you take your medicine?"

These days, people still tell Scruggs that she doesn't look like she has AIDS. Others seem awed that she got HIV considering that she's not from a poor family -- a myth that overlooks the reality that AIDS can strike anyone, regardless of socio-economic class.

"After 30 years of this disease, there's only a small part of the country that understands both that HIV is real and that it's here," she said.

Scruggs is the director of programs at the AIDS Alliance for Children, Youth and Families in Washington, D.C., and a minister at her church. She and Nathaniel have a blended family that includes her son Isaiah, Nathaniel's two children and another son, Lawrence, whom Scruggs adopted in 1997, when he was 9. The boy's father had died, possibly from AIDS-related complications.

Lawrence was a student in Scruggs' sister's second-grade class when his own mother decided she couldn't care for him any longer. Scruggs had wanted another child, but didn't want to risk passing on HIV to a baby of her own.

Lawrence is 25 now -- five years older than Isaiah, whom Scruggs was pregnant with at the time of her diagnosis.

Isaiah remembers feeling caught off guard when his mother brought up her illness when he was about 8. To this day, he fears getting HIV himself, based on his mother's experience.

"I see what she has to go through sometimes, and I see the pain that it causes her sometimes," he says. "Not as far as physically hurting her, but mentally."

Scruggs' fear that she would leave Isaiah alone never came true. He now has an extended family, including his big brother Lawrence, who coincidentally looks like him.

"I don't look at him as an adopted son," Scruggs said. "It was divined that he came into our lives." -CNN Health

<><><>*<><><>

HIV In 2000s: Love, Betrayal And A Calling

Tonya Rasberry dialed her husband's number, her composure shaken and her nerves numb.

She dreaded the call, but her husband picked up immediately.

"I got my test results back," she told him.

For a brief moment, silence hung in the air.

"What'd the doctor say?" he asked.

For the first time, the words fell out of her mouth: "I'm positive, too."

Rasberry heard his telephone drop -- it clattered against the hospital's tiled floor. She could hear his muffled cry -- the painful, gut wrenching cry that shakes a person so hard they can't make a sound.

"I ruined your life," he would tell her later. "I killed my family."

Her husband had AIDS. And now, she had HIV.

Rasberry could have thrown him out of their home, gathered their three kids and left him. Instead, she chose a different route.

She forgave him.

The modern epidemic

In the 30 years of HIV/AIDS, the virus has changed the way people think about sex and has raised the stakes of unprotected intimacy.

Since the virus was first reported on June 5, 1981, the disease has killed more than 25 million people worldwide. Today, about 33 million are living with HIV/AIDS -- more than a million in the United States.

In the United States, the demographic of the HIV/AIDS epidemic has spread from gay men in the 1980s to heterosexual minority women in the 1990s and 2000s. It disproportionately affects people of color: African-Americans and Hispanics.

"Although the numbers in the decades have been stable, the rates of the disease are unacceptably high," said Dr. Kevin Fenton, director of the CDC's National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, about the toll on African-American and Hispanic women. "New diagnoses are 19-22 times of white women in the U.S. That's a startling statistic."

Rasberry, 36, embodies another challenge of a modern day epidemic. She knew about HIV/AIDS from public health campaigns, but never imagined it would touch her -- after all, she was married.

Many women believe they are in monogamous relationships and later find out they got HIV from their partners, said Ingrid Floyd, executive director of Iris House Inc., a program for HIV-positive women in Harlem.

"How do you deal with that," Floyd said, "that your partner lives with the disease and never disclosed to you?"

The virus attacks immune systems but also leaves patients with the sting of betrayal. Could they trust another person again?

There's an even more difficult question.

"For many of them, there's a fear of rejection," Floyd said. "If you're HIV-positive, there's the whole disclosure part. Is someone going to accept your HIV status?"

Young love

They met on a hot May night in 1994.

A 19-year-old Rasberry had finished a day of busing tables at a Seattle seafood restaurant. She and her girlfriends had planned a night in the city. Dolled up in miniskirt and heels, they were crossing a street when a man called out to Rasberry.

It was important that he talk to her, he said. He was with his friends and they bet that he couldn't talk to a gorgeous girl like her.

Rasberry eyed the older man. She stood an inch taller. At 5 feet 5, he had a stocky build and broad shoulders, the structure of a former football player. But what he lacked in stature, he made up for in charisma.

His name was Eric.

Right away, she noticed he was nothing like other boys she had dated. He was a gentleman, always opening doors for her. And it was easy to get swept away at 19.

He brought her to the nicest restaurants, surprised her with balloons and champagne.

"He was a sweet guy," Rasberry said. "He took me everywhere -- vacations, shopping. I thought he was the best thing since sliced bread."

A year later, Rasberry was pregnant with their first child, a boy, Seaduan. Two years later, they welcomed a girl, Erykah, and a year later, another daughter, Tionne.

In 2000, the couple married in a simple garden ceremony in California. They raised the kids and a Labrador mix named Smokey in an apartment in Kent, near Seattle.

Her husband traveled frequently. He told her he worked in construction. She suspected this wasn't the case. Later, she would learn he had a house in Ohio and a music studio in California.

She warned him promiscuous behavior would hurt her and their kids. She wanted a regular family life or she would leave.

"I felt like he was willing to make those changes," Rasberry said. "I felt like I could stick in there longer. Then, he got sick shortly after that."

Paralysis

On a summer night in 2002, Eric wasn't feeling well. After picking up pizza for dinner, he arrived home and crumpled to the floor.

Maybe it was his diabetes. Maybe he just had too much sugar.

By the time he arrived at the hospital, he couldn't move his right side. Half his face drooped and his right hand curled and froze in place.

At 32, he had a brain infection called toxoplasmosis that had caused a stroke. Doctors were perplexed about how he had gotten it.

After a slew of tests, his doctor told him: "You have AIDS."

HIV/AIDS medications, while lifesaving, aren't as effective when the disease has advanced.

In most cases, the patients who don't recover "weren't aware of their status, have co-morbid status, substance abuse, or other chronic illness that make it harder to take HIV medication," said Dr. Judith Currier, chief of the division of infectious diseases at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.

When patients like Eric are diagnosed in later stages, they are more vulnerable to infections.

For patients like Rasberry, who start treatment in the earliest stage of the disease, life expectancy is close to people without HIV.

A loss

"I didn't have enough time to be sad for myself," Rasberry said about her diagnosis. "There was no time for that."

Overnight, she became the breadwinner with four dependents: her paralyzed husband and her kids, all under 10.

There was no time for anger. But Rasberry wondered, how had she become infected when she had tested negative for HIV for each of her pregnancies, in 1995, 1997 and 1999? Her children do not have HIV.

Her gaze fell to her husband.

The businessman who took pride in caring for his family had become bedridden. He was constantly fighting new infections.

"I had to dress him and bathe him," Rasberry said. "From that moment, I was doing everything for him."

A throat infection obstructed his ability to swallow, so a feeding tube was inserted. Every day, Rasberry pulverized his pills and cleaned his feeding tube.

"There was nobody else I'd do that for," she said.

Once 300 pounds, he shrank to a third that size.

"Every time I changed him or fed him, he would apologize," Rasberry said. "He was sorry about the HIV -- that I had to do this. He just looked so sad."

She told the kids their father was sick with diabetes.

She took her HIV medication, then she went to work at a collection agency. At night, she'd get dinner for the family and try to help her husband through the night.

She was wearing out.

As his health faded, Eric went into hospice care in the Seattle area, then to a facility near his family in California. He died on October 6, 2004, from complications of AIDS related to pneumonia. He was 34.

"I loved him," Rasberry said. "We have three gorgeous children. I had more good times in the relationship. I like to remember it for those things."

A new bond

Following her doctor's suggestion, Rasberry went to a woman's group called BABES Network-YWCA. There, she found a sisterhood of women who have been through the betrayals, the grief and the physical toll of HIV/AIDS.

"A lot of these women and mothers were in relationships, trusting somebody," Rasberry said about the patients she met. "Now their whole life is different."

She was paired with a counselor, Nicole Price, who had contracted HIV through a boyfriend.

Even though HIV was no laughing matter, "Tonya has a great sense of humor and she's always making us laugh," Price said.

Rasberry had a natural openness that put others at ease, even in difficult times, Price observed. It wasn't long before Rasberry became a peer counselor at BABES, guiding Seattle women through the health care and medication maze and the emotional minefield of HIV/AIDS disclosure.

This year, the program lost its federal funding, so several staff members, including Rasberry, may lose their jobs in July. Even with the prospect of another loss, Rasberry continues to share her personal story at health events, women's shelters and juvenile detention centers.

"HIV is not who I am," Rasberry says during her talks. "It's something I have."

Rasberry tells others about her kids, ages 15, 13 and 12, who understand what Rasberry does. They hug her and tell her they're proud of Mom for making a difference. She sticks to her medication and has had no major health problems.

Being so open about her HIV-status, Rasberry thought, would turn away love prospects. After all, her face has been plastered on Seattle buses urging residents to get tested for HIV.

But last year, Rasberry met a woman at a bar. They struck up a conversation and exchanged phone numbers. Days later, Rasberry mustered her nerve to call her.

They chatted pleasantly, until the woman asked what Rasberry did for a living.

"I work as an HIV counselor, because I am HIV-positive," Rasberry answered.

"Really?" the woman asked.

Then, Rasberry braced for the rejection. It never came.

The couple has been together nine months now.

Rasberry's girlfriend said it's true HIV does not define her, her honesty does. And it only makes her more attractive. –CNN Health


To read more about HIV/AIDS click here.

<><><>*<><><>

Illinois Civil Unions Law Goes Into Effect Wednesday

Starting Wednesday, same-sex couples in Illinois can enter into civil unions and enjoy many of the legal protections granted to married couples.

In January, Illinois joined five other states in legalizing civil unions. Gov. Pat Quinn signed the law in front of a crowd of cheering residents during a ceremony in a Chicago auditorium.

"We are showing the world that the people of Illinois believe in equality for all," Quinn said January 31. "We look forward to individuals and businesses from across the country choosing to move to Illinois where we believe that everyone is entitled to the same rights."

The provision, which goes into effect Wednesday, is called Senate Bill 1716 and creates the Illinois Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Union Act.

The new law will allow same-sex and heterosexual couples to enter into civil unions granting them many rights given to married couples.

These rights include automatic hospital visitation rights, the ability to make emergency medical decisions for partners, the ability to share a room in a nursing home, adoption and parental rights, pension benefits, inheritance rights and the right to dispose of a partner's remains, the governor's office said.

"In addition to Illinois, five other states and the District of Columbia have civil unions or similar laws on the books. Those states include California, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon and Washington," the governor's office said.

But some in Illinois object to the new law.

Illinois Family Institute, a nonprofit group that says it wants to reaffirm marriage in the state, called the law "divisive."

"Gov. Quinn should reject this anti-family bill and reject the efforts of the homosexual lobby to impose this highly contentious and controversial policy on the people of Illinois," David E. Smith, executive director of the group, said earlier.

But couples like Mercedes Santos and Theresa Volpe said the new law will dramatically change their lives.

It gives them the rights that other families have when it comes to their 6-year-old daughter and 2-year-old son, they told CNN affiliate WLS earlier this year.

"Our son actually has some illnesses, so going into the hospital, being able to say that we can both be in the room with him and make decisions without too many questions, just makes it easier for us," Santos said. –CNN U.S.

<><><>*<><><>

Jilted Ex-Boyfriend Puts Up Abortion Billboard

A New Mexico man's decision to lash out with a billboard ad saying his ex-girlfriend had an abortion against his wishes has touched off a legal debate over free speech and privacy rights.

The sign on Alamogordo's main thoroughfare shows 35-year-old Greg Fultz holding the outline of an infant. The text reads, "This Would Have Been A Picture Of My 2-Month Old Baby If The Mother Had Decided To Not KILL Our Child!"

Fultz's ex-girlfriend has taken him to court for harassment and violation of privacy. A domestic court official has recommended the billboard be removed.

But Fultz's attorney argues the order violates his client's free speech rights.

"As distasteful and offensive as the sign may be to some, for over 200 years in this country the First Amendment protects distasteful and offensive speech," Todd Holmes said.

The woman's friends say she had a miscarriage, not an abortion, according to a report in the Albuquerque Journal.

Holmes disputes that, saying his case is based on the accuracy of his client's statement.

"My argument is: What Fultz said is the truth," Holmes said.

The woman's lawyer said she had not discussed the pregnancy with her client. But for Ellen Jessen, whether her client had a miscarriage or an abortion is not the point. The central issue is her client's privacy and the fact that the billboard has caused severe emotional distress, Jessen said.

"Her private life is not a matter of public interest," she told the Alamogordo Daily News.

Jessen says her client's ex-boyfriend has crossed the line.

"Nobody is stopping him from talking about father's rights. ... but a person can't invade someone's private life."

For his part, Holmes invoked the U.S. Supreme Court decision from earlier this year concerning the Westboro Baptist Church, which is known for its anti-gay protests at military funerals and other high-profile events. He believes the high court's decision to allow the protests, as hurtful as they are, is grounds for his client to put up the abortion billboard.

"Very unpopular offensive speech," he told the Alamogordo Daily News. "The Supreme Court, in an 8 to 1 decision, said that is protected speech."

Holmes says he is going to fight the order to remove the billboard through a District Court appeal. –Yahoo News